Perhaps he wishes to leave for the reasons you've outlined?bernardo-silva has been a media target ever since that Mendy text and I think it's a target attack in the media that they keep putting out to unsettle the play and club ? it's been a couple of seasons NOW
why would bernardo-silva want to leave the best run club in the world with players like KDB foden grealish haaland Dias walker rodri
NoooooSergej Milinkovic-Savic
I am sick of hearing this "Grealish's marketability is also miles higher "
Please tell me in what way?
Jack Grealish in footballing term has done nothing, I see him in some shitty tabloid newspapers about who he is shagging or what hair cut he's just had.
What marketing value AT THIS MOMENT does he bring to this football club?
All I know living in Asia I see loads of City shirts , especially in the last 5 years, we are becoming very popular here.I appreciate what you're saying here, are you really sure you can't quite get why Grealish is more marketable...
"in the UK/England"?
That was what the rest of my sentence was pointing to as well.
I listed some reasons why Grealish' being English makes him particularly valuable to a club like City one being due to perceived negatives/media coverage in the UK/England in seeking to change that.
However, even whilst marketing value no doubt was one key incentive behind signing him, and why we pay the 100m, more than clubs from outside of the PL would pay, there is no way City would sign a player primarily for marketing reasons, clearly.
Are we not forgetting how adored he was during the Euros by English fans whinging on and on about how he didn't start every game? He also has extreme confidence, good looking, and personality and...is Enlglish, which leads to younger / more casual fans more likely to catch their interest.
You don't think we have more younger and more casual "glory hunter" fans (like ALL successful clubs do in any sport) from the UK now both from and not from Greater Manchester than the past as a result of signing him?
Ian Cheesman interviews some of them (one a "Yank" that I was embarrassed to see him interview making us all sound like this after a match last season).
Like this or not.
I appreciate what you're saying here, are you really sure you can't quite get why Grealish is more marketable...
"in the UK/England"?
That was what the rest of my sentence was pointing to as well.
I listed some reasons why Grealish' being English makes him particularly valuable to a club like City one being due to perceived negatives/media coverage in the UK/England in seeking to change that.
However, even whilst marketing value no doubt was one key incentive behind signing him, and why we pay the 100m, more than clubs from outside of the PL would pay, there is no way City would sign a player primarily for marketing reasons, clearly.
Are we not forgetting how adored he was during the Euros by English fans whinging on and on about how he didn't start every game? He also has extreme confidence, good looking, and personality and...is Enlglish, which leads to younger / more casual fans more likely to catch their interest.
You don't think we have more younger and more casual "glory hunter" fans (like ALL successful clubs do in any sport) from the UK now both from and not from Greater Manchester than the past as a result of signing him?
Ian Cheesman interviews some of them (one a "Yank" that I was embarrassed to see him interview making us all sound like this after a match last season).
Like this or not.