richards30
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 May 2009
- Messages
- 31,828
Good luck with that, you still owe us 45m for Torres.
@projectriver already kindly showed that Barca actually aren’t behind with the Torres fee.
Good luck with that, you still owe us 45m for Torres.
Lever 55 activated by Barca to sign him.barca's magic beans again, it's like the scouse coutinio money all over again
Or a swap for Frenkie de Jong (although de Jong is on higher wages). Perhaps Pep will speak to the Barcelona player as well.€100mill, take it or leave it you lever cunts! And a sack of coffee beans.
We weren’t generous in the Torres deal - the fee we got for him was the biggest heist in football historyEven if they aren't far behind with Torres' paymernt I don't think we will be generous with Barcelona this time around. I don't think we are going to hamstring ourselves this far into the Tranfer Window either.
While I agree we did let them pay on drip.We weren’t generous in the Torres deal - the fee we got for him was the biggest heist in football history
Different players but for me Kovacic is a top quality player who will be a huge asset.Gundogan is a much, much better than Kovacic and he was even before he joined us. That doesn’t mean Kovacic can’t be of use to us. I want him to succeed. But effectively it is a downgrade
I agree they are different players. The comparison comes from the reality of Gundogan leaving and him comingDifferent players but for me Kovacic is a top quality player who will be a huge asset.
As we will be doing if we sign Gvardiol as per almost all transfers between any clubs. Other than buyout clauses practically no transfers are paid for in one upfront payment.While I agree we did let them pay on drip.
But the reality of a year older Gundo has to be considered, he has already picked up an injury at Barca, I personally think he picked the perfect time to leave.I agree they are different players. The comparison comes from the reality of Gundogan leaving and him coming
I’m not arguing that. What I am saying is the Gundogan of last season will have been replaced by current day Kovacic. I’m arguing as a direct replacement it is a downgrade a drop off in quality for the squad. I do believe we could have found a better option. This doesn’t fly well here, where it’s tastier to imagine our fans claiming “what a bargain” and “we ripped off Chelsea” in future online discussions.But the reality of a year older Gundo has to be considered, he has already picked up an injury at Barca, I personally think he picked the perfect time to leave.
Hopefully he brings something different but not likely to get those vital goals that made the difference.I’m not arguing that. What I am saying is the Gundogan of last season will have been replaced by current day Kovacic. I’m arguing as a direct replacement it is a downgrade a drop off in quality for the squad. I do believe we could have found a better option. This doesn’t fly well here, where it’s tastier to imagine our fans claiming “what a bargain” and “we ripped off Chelsea” in future online discussions.
It should be said that Pep would have liked to keep Gundo even in his older version
Exactly. Gundogan is one of our most vital players of the Pep era. It doesn’t surprise me we were willing to go high for Bellingham and Rice. But effectively, at this point, it is only Kovacic who has come. So it is an excellent player that went and a decent one that came. This irrespective of who takes up specific rolesHopefully he brings something different but not likely to get those vital goals that made the difference.
Silva scores vital goals every season, easy got a double figures season in him when pushed that far forward as we've seen before.Hopefully he brings something different but not likely to get those vital goals that made the difference.