pride in battle
Well-Known Member
You did, were you pissed ?I absolutely did not say he was “not good in the air and weak in the challenge”.
You did, were you pissed ?I absolutely did not say he was “not good in the air and weak in the challenge”.
“He isn’t aerially dominant” is not the same as saying “he’s not good in the air”.Yes you did...
Henry. Was playing today's football 20 years ago.
Pains me to say it, he is obviously a cock but Giggs was a great playerAdams captained Arsenal and England. He was a legend of a player.
Sad to see Giggs and Scholes getting slagged too.
You were pissed then...“He isn’t aerially dominant” is not the same as saying “he’s not good in the air”.
It’s saying he doesn’t dominate, like someone such as Kompany or Terry did.
He’s good at it, but he doesn’t dominate.
Saying “he rarely out strengths an opponent” is not the same as saying “he is weak in the challenge”.
Look at Van Dyke for example - uses pure brute strength several times a game. Walker doesn’t.
That doesn’t mean he is “weak in the challenge”.
Walker’s game is based primarily on his explosiveness over the first 10 metres, alongside his pace over slightly longer distances.
You very, very rarely see an opponent beat him in that area of the game.
I toiled over vinny, I thought about terry as all 3 TA, VK, JT but no one can deny what Adams did to make arsenal become relevent again, in the present era of technical player he looks a dinosaur, but blue tinted specs off his contribition was massiveAdam’s above Kompany?
Vinnie was a much better footballer.
Kom
City humour at its finest that day, when we scored a late consolation; "You’re not singing anymore!"Outside of City players, I’d go for Henry. When they gave us a drubbing that day at Maine Road was quite something else. Not many opposition players get clspped off but he did that day.