I believe music can reach out and inspire and impress when combined with poetry and a good reference to Paul Simon IMO definitely not maybe pardon the pun.Good-looking lead singers of bands make a lot more money than poets, and get more, errr, “attention” too. He was a drunk Navy brat obviously smart and talented enough to become iconic and dead before he could slip into self-parody.
I’ve often expressed my distaste for “poetic” lead singers. I like novels. Narrative. Stories. Observational humo(u)r. Cleverness. Turns of phrase. Or irony. Or satire. Failing that, personal anguish laid bare to which I can relate. Not poetry.
Poetry and rock and roll don’t really mix, not to me anyway. Maybe — MAYBE — Paul Simon? Dylan, but I don’t really like Dylan that much (but see below). We’re back to the same old thing, mate — music to listen to vs. music to move to. You tend to listen to poets, not move to them, unless they’re activists/revolutionaries (which Dylan was, and so often more a storyteller anyhow). Jim Morrison was neither.
I don't necessarily believe you have to be an activist in order to have credibility to listen and or to move to.
To me that is little more than a cliche.
I am not interested in Jim because of who is was or how he lived because he was not part of my life as such so I am interested in him for how he performed his role in the band.
you might agree with me he had a disconnect to the band which didn't help but was part of who he was I suppose.