Blue Moon Top 100 Bands Artists - Full List of Artists (pg 287)

Because I put Harrison in my 15 it would be a travesty if that made the Beatles No1, I’d want to withdraw my vote and have a recount. Same for Oasis if LG isn’t in the top 5: sorry I didn’t take more time with my top 15
Don’t worry, I counted your George Harrison vote under his own name, so it didn’t affect The Beatles total.

Neither were any votes for Liam Gallagher counted towards Oasis.

Any votes for Morrissey went in the charity bin.
 
how? They all rule the roost.
1. Beatles - yeah I can dig
2. Zepplin - overated nonces with terrible grating singing voices.
3. Floyd - Boring, monotonous, excruciatingly long-winded and utterly pretentious
4. Oasis - much ado about nothing.
5. Stones - meh pub band ;-) (according to someone)

Dylan I will give credence to.
 
I liked the Doors fine, but REM was better at -- playing music, having a long career, releasing records with mostly all good songs without much filler, keeping songs under 5 minutes, eliminating idiot solos, having something interesting to say about social structure (though it took them five albums to accomplish that), and -- most of all -- not having a drug-addled wastrel drunk as a lead singer who never would have been anything had he not been good-looking . . . you know, shit like that.

At least Ray Manzarek produced X, a band no one else here put in their top 15 but me I'm guessing.
But REM didnt have one of the worlds greatest poets in their line up.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.