Bobby ain't happy! (The Mail.....)

Re: Bobby aint happy! (The Mail.....)

hgblue said:
No, which is why I said that Mancini's frustration is clearly with Marwood. I don't believe for one minute our owner would act in bad faith, and if he did Mancini is not the type to stick around.

Do you think that Marwood is working actively against the owners wishes?
 
Re: Bobby aint happy! (The Mail.....)

Balti said:
SmellsLikeBullshit.jpg
Agreed balti the tabloids would love mancini to leave and you know why coz hes doing a great job at city
 
<a class="postlink" href="http://t.co/fqwZjoWA" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://t.co/fqwZjoWA</a>
Here's one he made up earlier.
Carlos Tevez is poised to move to AC Milan this week, opening the way for Manchester City to make their £30million bid for Robin van Persie.
And
a source close to City revealing last night: ‘They are selling Tevez to Milan. You’ll see it in the next few days.
Bullshiting liar springs to mind.
 
Mancini won't leave over transfer policy
-------------------------------------------------------

Roberto Mancini has laughed off reports that he is willing to quit Manchester City in frustration at the club's transfer policy.

City have only made one summer signing, Jack Rodwell, while failing to lure a host of big-name targets to the Etihad Stadium.

And it was suggested that the Italian would walk away from his lucrative five-year deal with the champions.

But he said: "No. It is not true. If the newspaper sells a lot of copies, I am happy for the newspaper. I never said this and I never think this."

Mancini is looking to strengthen City's squad before the transfer window closes with Scott Sinclair's move from Swansea thought to be imminent.

"We have our targets and I hope we can close in the next few days," he said, while insisting he had never been interested in Liverpool defender Daniel Agger.

Asked how many players he wanted to sign, Mancini joked: "Ten or 15."

Read more at <a class="postlink" href="http://www.espn.co.uk/football/sport/story/166941.html?CMP=OTC-RSS#mmqKfkrRaAuekGfR.99" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.espn.co.uk/football/sport/st ... AuekGfR.99</a>
 
His record in the transfer market is questionable to say the least, particularly when it comes to buying defenders. Kolorov and Savic for instance. Clichy has been a quality buy but he was already premier league proven. A blind man could have bought the already established stars like Kun ,yaya and Merlin. He should quit moaning and concentrate on making us hard to score against.
 
Going off his comments,dotting the I's and crossing the T's is all thats required on our reinforcements - should calm a few down.......<br /><br />-- 26 Aug 2012 21:14 --<br /><br />
B\connellblue said:
His record in the transfer market is questionable to say the least, particularly when it comes to buying defenders. Kolorov and Savic for instance. Clichy has been a quality buy but he was already premier league proven. A blind man could have bought the already established stars like Kun ,yaya and Merlin. He should quit moaning and concentrate on making us hard to score against.

You aint gonna be popular mate,regardless of fact.
 
B\connellblue said:
His record in the transfer market is questionable to say the least, particularly when it comes to buying defenders. Kolorov and Savic for instance. Clichy has been a quality buy but he was already premier league proven. A blind man could have bought the already established stars like Kun ,yaya and Merlin. He should quit moaning and concentrate on making us hard to score against.
Surely all that shit was from Marwood ?

















;-)
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.