VOOMER said:
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
I fucking wouldn't.
The Bullingdon bullshitter would be phoning his chauffeur and off like a shot.
So he got a first in classics and has a sense of humour.
And?
Pol Pot probably had a stock of great one-liners too.
He's still a prat,and I don't give a fuck if a bunch of dim cockneys prattle on about him sorting the underground out.
Mussolini made the trains run on time,and he was a **** as well.
I don't hate him for being a toff - I hate him because he is a prick.
It's that simple.
No class war,no smoke,no mirrors.
Why a bunch of working class/middle class northerners are falling over themselves to welcome him to their bosom simply baffles me.
Hold on there, believing he would actually be more use to me than a cold cock specialist like Barton, doesn't mean I'd vote for him. However, why is he a prick and not line my own pockets Ken Livingston?
If you read the last page or two,I have explained exactly why he is a prick.
Did I say Livingstone wasn't a prick?
He was a shameless self-promoting wanker who is miles away from socialism.
But the biggest difference between him and Son Of Dumbledore is that he will never lead his party,and possibly the country,whereas Doris could.