Bottom of the league

Ha ha, the most transparent example of someone having a pre-prepared ‘faux outraged’ answer and then just needing to dream up a question (or in this case, ‘ethical analysis assessment’) to go with it, I’ve ever seen. What a bunch of complete cnuts
Perfectly summarised.
 
Seeing as nobody else will post it, here's the table:

Ethical Premier League Table

Fulham 115

Aston Villa 114

Burnley 112

Brighton 110

Crystal Palace 110

Everton 110

Leicester City 105

Liverpool 105

Chelsea 100

West Brom 100

Leeds United 96

Arsenal 95

West Ham 92

Tottenham 91

Newcastle 90

Southampton 90

Manchester United 85

Sheffield United 60

Wolves 57

Manchester City 20



I wonder if there are any teams elsewhere in Europe with a score as low as ours?
 
Shows how utterly ridiculous this "league table" is. The reason we're supposedly at the bottom is because of issues with our ownership. Yet Chelsea, owned by an alleged kleptocrat who's a mate of Putin, is in 10th place.

Brighton, owned and financed by a man who made his fortune from gambling, is in 4th place. Etc, etc.
 
Shows how utterly ridiculous this "league table" is. The reason we're supposedly at the bottom is because of issues with our ownership. Yet Chelsea, owned by an alleged kleptocrat who's a mate of Putin, is in 10th place.

Brighton, owned and financed by a man who made his fortune from gambling, is in 4th place. Etc, etc.
It’s nonsense Colin. Their membership is not exactly full of the world’s greatest political and economic analysts and academics. It is a tiny body of self-righteous ego trippers suddenly given the veil of legitimacy by the genuine proven deviant sex cases and hypocrites on the Guardian sports desk who for the last two years have pretty much declared open warfare with our club.
My only surprise is that McGeehan hasn’t daubed his Qatari-funded fingerprints all over it
 
Weirdly, the author of this particular Guardian hatchet job, Michael Savage, has not written any single other sports story about any other team in recent months.All his other stuff is Covid or politics. Almost as if someone like Conn or Nakrani has farmed it off to a junior from the online churn factory to dodge the personal flak
 
So all that's changed is we get new owners who have invested more of their own money into every aspect of our club and more into the community than probably any club ever and we go from mid table darlings earning 2003 and 2008 Fairplay spots into the Uefa Cup to the worst ethical club?
 
So all that's changed is we get new owners who have invested more of their own money into every aspect of our club and more into the community than probably any club ever and we go from mid table darlings earning 2003 and 2008 Fairplay spots into the Uefa Cup to the worst ethical club?
Jealousy is a very powerful emotion, mate.
 
Seeing as nobody else will post it, here's the table:

Ethical Premier League Table

Fulham 115

Aston Villa 114

Burnley 112

Brighton 110

Crystal Palace 110

Everton 110

Leicester City 105

Liverpool 105

Chelsea 100

West Brom 100

Leeds United 96

Arsenal 95

West Ham 92

Tottenham 91

Newcastle 90

Southampton 90

Manchester United 85

Sheffield United 60

Wolves 57

Manchester City 20



I wonder if there are any teams elsewhere in Europe with a score as low as ours?
Not seen this before we’re second bottom so
furloughing staff and making redundancies building mountain of debt =ethical
Not furloughing staff donating millions in ventilators and essential medical supplies across Europe and USA =unethical
What a load of bollox who makes up these lists
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.