So why have such a clause? as far as i am aware it has not been there before.
For us.
So why have such a clause? as far as i am aware it has not been there before.
Not if we have first refusal, which is a common enough clause.Surely they’d just add 40% on
Brilliant business, well done City..good luck to him. but lets not over rate him. he was not good enough to get into our team right now. in the future who knows. but he was not some mbappe level talent. lets see how he does in madrid
The clause seems to be a bit of a PR stunt to me - a decent way of making the fans less pissed off about losing a promising young playerQuite frankly I am surprised that the Man Utd clause is legal. Whatever happened to freedom of movement and player's rights? If Diaz is stupid enough to want to move to the Swamp in the future, he should not be blocked from so doing as the clause effectively does.