Breaking records/stats thread

I'm guessing you are referring to Leeds 1968 league cup/fairs cup win. According to Wikipedia, UEFA did not organise or recognise the Fairs cup so do not acknowledge it as a European competition. On that basis, I'm more than happy to claim City were the first side to win a double including a European trophy.
The Fairs Cup at that time was organised by FIFA and not UEFA; was invitation only and entry not on football merit; and was a limited competition which was, in effect, played across two seasons (Leeds' two legged final was played the following season) So you are correct.. City was the first English club to win both full domestic and European trophies in the same season.
 
Last edited:
So Liverpool arrived at the 33 victories whilst playing 46 league matches 71.74% success.

Our "Boys in Blue" reached that total by playing 41 league matches 80.49% success.

Another record that will be difficult to beat and we still have 3 matches to play in this calendar year.
 
City projected to get to 89 league goals by the end of the season based on current goals per game. With KDB back in harness, can we hit 100 and outscore the greatest front 3 in the history of English football?
 
City projected to get to 89 league goals by the end of the season based on current goals per game. With KDB back in harness, can we hit 100 and outscore the greatest front 3 in the history of English football?

Yes, I put such a prediction back in August. Let's see what happens.

Why expect many goals, given that we don't have a striker?

Well, in my view, this team is potentially the most creative in the history of English football. It has playmakers across many positions: Cancelo, Rodri, Gundogan, Foden, Bernardo, KDB, Grealish. Mahrez is creative as well and Jesus has been our top assistant so far. We lack a striker, OK, but we will create so many chances (injuries permitting), that we can still hit 100 goals, or at least more than Liverpool. Might be wrong, time will tell.
 
Never been a fan of calendar year stats in football. I’m not even certain when they became something significant - I certainly don’t remember them being discussed 20 years ago. Wonder if it’s down to the Ballon d’Or factor and people obsessing about that?
Football should only be measured in terms of seasons as far as I’m concerned. That’s where trophies are won and what teams will ultimately be remembered for.
 
Last edited:
Never been a fan of calendar year stats in football. I’m not even certain when they became something significant - I certainly don’t remember them being discussed 20 years ago. Wonder if it’s down to the Ballon d’Or factor and people obsessing about that?
Football should only be measured in terms of seasons as far as I’m concerned. That’s where trophies are won and what teams will ultimately be remembered for.
when the red madia tried to play down our achivments
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top