lancs blue
Well-Known Member
It's a few pages back, 81/82 season.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Breaking records/stats thread
- Thread starter Proy
- Start date
jimharri
Moderator
Thought it probably would be! Thanks.It's a few pages back, 81/82 season.
Mancity1980
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 May 2011
- Messages
- 11,326
Not since Adolf Hitler bombed Stan Boardman’s chippy!...:)I'm sure it must have been addressed on here since wednesday evening, but I'm too lazy to check! When's the last time we won both league fixtures on Merseyside in the same season? One for the anoraks out there!
jimharri
Moderator
Those bloody Geeeeeeeeeeermans.Not since Adolf Hitler bombed Stan Boardman’s chippy!...:)
City Raider
Well-Known Member
Equalled a club record 11 successive away wins according to BBC.
Also, Manchester City are unbeaten in their past 25 games across all competitions (W22 D3) - their second-longest run without defeat under Guardiola, after a 28-game spell between April and December 2017.
Game 29 - the rags! If we get there ok.
Also, Manchester City are unbeaten in their past 25 games across all competitions (W22 D3) - their second-longest run without defeat under Guardiola, after a 28-game spell between April and December 2017.
Game 29 - the rags! If we get there ok.
D
D
Deleted member 77198
Guest
That’s also game 20 for wins in a row, if we make it that farEqualled a club record 11 successive away wins according to BBC.
Also, Manchester City are unbeaten in their past 25 games across all competitions (W22 D3) - their second-longest run without defeat under Guardiola, after a 28-game spell between April and December 2017.
Game 29 - the rags! If we get there ok.
That’s also game 20 for wins in a row, if we make it that far
Would be 21 would it not? gladbach 19, west ham 20, fingers crossed.
D
D
Deleted member 77198
Guest
Bloody hell, forgot about the CL!Would be would it not? gladbach 19, west ham 20, fingers crossed.
Stiff Little Wingers
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 25 Aug 2010
- Messages
- 3,026
Haven't we got Wolves at home on 2 March?Bloody hell, forgot about the CL!
Inter Me Nan
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Aug 2012
- Messages
- 11,184
Yup.Haven't we got Wolves at home on 2 March?
D
D
Deleted member 77198
Guest
Just seen that, did well there didn’t I?!Haven't we got Wolves at home on 2 March?
jimharri
Moderator
#Crashandburn!Just seen that, did well there didn’t I?!
jimharri
Moderator
Four successive home games coming up in the PL. Get 12 pts from them and I MIGHT start getting quietly confident.
W
W
worsleyweb
Guest
Four successive home games coming up in the PL. Get 12 pts from them and I MIGHT start getting quietly confident.
have we really! That’s good news.
D
D
Deleted member 77198
Guest
I was only thinking this morning it feels like we’ve barely been at the EtihadFour successive home games coming up in the PL. Get 12 pts from them and I MIGHT start getting quietly confident.
We never been there, it alway emptyI was only thinking this morning it feels like we’ve barely been at the Etihad
jimharri
Moderator
have we really! That’s good news.
West HamI was only thinking this morning it feels like we’ve barely been at the Etihad
Wolves
Rags
Saints
Woke this morning with a thought that City are the only team with 3 consecutive managers to win the English PL. (ok I’m 2-3 years late with that thought - shush!)
pretty good definition of a dynasty - multiple consecutive successful leaders.
Rather than a single successful dictator...
NB checking further back, Liverpool pre-PL have had 2 sets of dynasties, early 1900’s (3 managers) and then shankly -> dalglish (4). Interestingly both lasted about the same time, 30 years.
Sunderland also had a dynasty of 3, lasting 40 years starting in 1899 ... though the periods between winning (3 times) the league were well spaced out!
pretty good definition of a dynasty - multiple consecutive successful leaders.
Rather than a single successful dictator...
NB checking further back, Liverpool pre-PL have had 2 sets of dynasties, early 1900’s (3 managers) and then shankly -> dalglish (4). Interestingly both lasted about the same time, 30 years.
Sunderland also had a dynasty of 3, lasting 40 years starting in 1899 ... though the periods between winning (3 times) the league were well spaced out!
Mad Eyed Screamer
Moderator
Yes. Over the last 70 years only 2 rag managers have won the title where as City have had 3 managers over a 6 year periodWoke this morning with a thought that City are the only team with 3 consecutive managers to win the English PL. (ok I’m 2-3 years late with that thought - shush!)
pretty good definition of a dynasty - multiple consecutive successful leaders.
Rather than a single successful dictator...
NB checking further back, Liverpool pre-PL have had 2 sets of dynasties, early 1900’s (3 managers) and then shankly -> dalglish (4). Interestingly both lasted about the same time, 30 years.
Sunderland also had a dynasty of 3, lasting 40 years starting in 1899 ... though the periods between winning (3 times) the league were well spaced out!
jimharri
Moderator
Bet you never thought that Zinch was our most successful player (win percentage-wise) in our 13 year history, eh?