Bridge to the Dippers?

LoveCity said:
How good is Cunningham? Because supposing we do sign Kolarov, he can't play the projected 60-70 games this season and as loyal as he is, Garrido is largely a liability. So if we sold Bridge, we'd have to play Garrido, Cunningham, or a non-specialist left back like Lescott when Kolarov (if we sign him) isn't available or needs resting.

if we sign Kolarov he will be first choice left back
boateng will be rightback and cover for left back( as he better than Bridge at left back)

that will give Cunningham at least another year to develop and try to stake his claim for the lb position
 
With Bridge and Johnson as their full backs then Liverpool will be awesome defensively down the flanks haha
 
kippaxwarrior said:
Well they have agreed to see Insua
<a class="postlink" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/l/liverpool/8831589.stm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/footbal ... 831589.stm</a>

And with this talk about Bale and its looking ever more likely were getting Kolarov, i really think this could happen.
Only stumbling block would be wages i reckon

Thoughts?


anybody who builds my hope up like this attempt by you want fuckin







:)<br /><br />-- Sun Jul 18, 2010 8:59 am --<br /><br />
Ducky_ said:
When Mascherano is sold they may have about 25 million to spend on players.

I'd let bridge go for about 10 million.



yes i think 10 mil ougt to do it will liverpool except a cheque or will it have to be cash
 
LoveCity said:
How good is Cunningham? Because supposing we do sign Kolarov, he can't play the projected 60-70 games this season and as loyal as he is, Garrido is largely a liability. So if we sold Bridge, we'd have to play Garrido, Cunningham, or a non-specialist left back like Lescott when Kolarov (if we sign him) isn't available or needs resting.


He is absolutely awful. At Leicester City he was so bad he was the butt of all jokes and ridicule on their forums.

Not good enough nor is Bridge, but Bridge is certainly a lot beter than him
 
taggarc said:
LoveCity said:
How good is Cunningham? Because supposing we do sign Kolarov, he can't play the projected 60-70 games this season and as loyal as he is, Garrido is largely a liability. So if we sold Bridge, we'd have to play Garrido, Cunningham, or a non-specialist left back like Lescott when Kolarov (if we sign him) isn't available or needs resting.


He is absolutely awful. At Leicester City he was so bad he was the butt of all jokes and ridicule on their forums.

Not good enough nor is Bridge, but Bridge is certainly a lot beter than him

Your thinking of Ryan McGivern.
 
whp.blue said:
LoveCity said:
How good is Cunningham? Because supposing we do sign Kolarov, he can't play the projected 60-70 games this season and as loyal as he is, Garrido is largely a liability. So if we sold Bridge, we'd have to play Garrido, Cunningham, or a non-specialist left back like Lescott when Kolarov (if we sign him) isn't available or needs resting.

if we sign Kolarov he will be first choice left back
boateng will be rightback and cover for left back( as he better than Bridge at left back)

that will give Cunningham at least another year to develop and try to stake his claim for the lb position

Cunningham looked good against The Timbers. I could almost imagine that City will sell Wayne Bridge if good offers come in, and let Cunningham play second or third fiddle. There is also cover vy Lescott and Boateng (Richards och Zabalet cover left back)
 
I was thinking this might happen when our interest for Kolarov started getting concrete.

I don't think Wayne will be happy on the bench (I know he was at Chelsea, but he's getting on a bit now) and I think Garrido is adequate cover and happy to do that role (particularly now he has Silva to chat to).

Liverpool need a left back (at least one really) and much as we slag Wayne off, there aren't too many better options available to Roy - I don't think many people would say Bridge isn't better than Konchesky.

So yeah, I could see it happening. Fee + wages could be an issue of course. We'll see.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.