Neil McNab
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 May 2009
- Messages
- 3,371
No different to a social sponger, disgusting lack of self respect!
alera said:It's going to be near enough impossible to get rid of him now. He's crap not interested in playing football and on daft money. We really are into offering 75% of his wages due over the the rest of his contract to funk off.
The Championship loan system opens the week after next, trust me, he'll be gone EVEN if we have to pay all his wages and the same goes for Ned too.......moomba said:Have heard he's going back to West Ham on loan next week.
Neil McNab said:No different to a social sponger, disgusting lack of self respect!
carlosespana said:well done john terry for fuckin his wife probably to lazy to get of his idle backside to do it himself show some respect bridge and
fuck off!!!!!!
Soulboy said:carlosespana said:well done john terry for fuckin his wife probably to lazy to get of his idle backside to do it himself show some respect bridge and
fuck off!!!!!!
Eh?
Wasn't his wife, and John Terry claims there was no sexual relationship.
Apart from that, good post.
SWP's back said:Soulboy said:carlosespana said:well done john terry for fuckin his wife probably to lazy to get of his idle backside to do it himself show some respect bridge and
fuck off!!!!!!
Eh?
Wasn't his wife, and John Terry claims there was no sexual relationship.
Apart from that, good post.
Oh well if he claims that then it must be true
*stupid annoying double lipped smiley face*
Soulboy said:SWP's back said:Soulboy said:Eh?
Wasn't his wife, and John Terry claims there was no sexual relationship.
Apart from that, good post.
Oh well if he claims that then it must be true
*stupid annoying double lipped smiley face*
Well he's admitted to just about every other affair so why so coy about this one? The trollop also stated that there was nothing in it.
Do I believe them... or do I believe gossip on a messageboard?
Tough call.
Call me naive but I tend to see the best in every one!
Oh, and previous poster mentioned that Bridge was married... no witty little retort to that? More concenrened with my comments? I'm flatterred. Seriously.
Like I said previously, be careful, you're getting a reputation! ;-))
SWP's back said:Soulboy said:SWP's back said:Oh well if he claims that then it must be true
*stupid annoying double lipped smiley face*
Well he's admitted to just about every other affair so why so coy about this one? The trollop also stated that there was nothing in it.
Do I believe them... or do I believe gossip on a messageboard?
Tough call.
Call me naive but I tend to see the best in every one!
Oh, and previous poster mentioned that Bridge was married... no witty little retort to that? More concenrened with my comments? I'm flatterred. Seriously.
Like I said previously, be careful, you're getting a reputation! ;-))
A reputation with people I couldn't care less about on a message board? Oh no. How will I cope, how should I becareful? What awful future would await? I've enough "mates" on here to comfort myself with, thanks for your concern though, means a lot.
As for not pulling up the other poster on Bridge being married, why would I pull him up, you had already done that. He was simply incorrect, not naive in the extreme. Look at how Wayne Bridge dealt with Terry and tell me whether he believed Terry or not.
Who to believe? John Terry and you (ha) or someone that looked as though they'd have happily garrotted the potential transgressor at Stamford Bridge?
*insert further twatty smiley*
SWP's back said:Soulboy said:SWP's back said:Oh well if he claims that then it must be true
*stupid annoying double lipped smiley face*
Well he's admitted to just about every other affair so why so coy about this one? The trollop also stated that there was nothing in it.
Do I believe them... or do I believe gossip on a messageboard?
Tough call.
Call me naive but I tend to see the best in every one!
Oh, and previous poster mentioned that Bridge was married... no witty little retort to that? More concenrened with my comments? I'm flatterred. Seriously.
Like I said previously, be careful, you're getting a reputation! ;-))
A reputation with people I couldn't care less about on a message board? Oh no. How will I cope, how should I becareful? What awful future would await? I've enough "mates" on here to comfort myself with, thanks for your concern though, means a lot.
As for not pulling up the other poster on Bridge being married, why would I pull him up, you had already done that. He was simply incorrect, not naive in the extreme. Look at how Wayne Bridge dealt with Terry and tell me whether he believed Terry or not.
Who to believe? John Terry and you (ha) or someone that looked as though they'd have happily garrotted the potential transgressor at Stamford Bridge?
*insert further twatty smiley*
gordondaviesmoustache said:SWP's back said:Soulboy said:Well he's admitted to just about every other affair so why so coy about this one? The trollop also stated that there was nothing in it.
Do I believe them... or do I believe gossip on a messageboard?
Tough call.
Call me naive but I tend to see the best in every one!
Oh, and previous poster mentioned that Bridge was married... no witty little retort to that? More concenrened with my comments? I'm flatterred. Seriously.
Like I said previously, be careful, you're getting a reputation! ;-))
A reputation with people I couldn't care less about on a message board? Oh no. How will I cope, how should I becareful? What awful future would await? I've enough "mates" on here to comfort myself with, thanks for your concern though, means a lot.
As for not pulling up the other poster on Bridge being married, why would I pull him up, you had already done that. He was simply incorrect, not naive in the extreme. Look at how Wayne Bridge dealt with Terry and tell me whether he believed Terry or not.
Who to believe? John Terry and you (ha) or someone that looked as though they'd have happily garrotted the potential transgressor at Stamford Bridge?
*insert further twatty smiley*
Yes you have mate.
And the more sensible posters like me wouldn't think so much of you if you weren't standing your corner so robustly as a matter of course.
You're a good poster too Soulboy before you think I'm taking sides.
Although you are usually wrong ;-)
Soulboy said:SWP's back said:Soulboy said:Well he's admitted to just about every other affair so why so coy about this one? The trollop also stated that there was nothing in it.
Do I believe them... or do I believe gossip on a messageboard?
Tough call.
Call me naive but I tend to see the best in every one!
Oh, and previous poster mentioned that Bridge was married... no witty little retort to that? More concenrened with my comments? I'm flatterred. Seriously.
Like I said previously, be careful, you're getting a reputation! ;-))
A reputation with people I couldn't care less about on a message board? Oh no. How will I cope, how should I becareful? What awful future would await? I've enough "mates" on here to comfort myself with, thanks for your concern though, means a lot.
As for not pulling up the other poster on Bridge being married, why would I pull him up, you had already done that. He was simply incorrect, not naive in the extreme. Look at how Wayne Bridge dealt with Terry and tell me whether he believed Terry or not.
Who to believe? John Terry and you (ha) or someone that looked as though they'd have happily garrotted the potential transgressor at Stamford Bridge?
*insert further twatty smiley*
Not get a shag this morning?
Oh, and is that the same devastated Bridge now showing off his latest dolly bird? Bridge is a softarse both on and off the pitch, he sulks at everything, that's why no one wants to sign him!
Whether Bridge believed Terry or not is irrelevant. You don't know the facts and neither do I.
I just like to see the best in people. Even you.
You name 25 players. Those under the age of 21 on the 1st January 2011 do not need to be registered. If City do not have 25 over 21 year old players that we'd rather include than Bridge then I see no issue with including him.bzekosilva said:even though i loathe bridge for doing eff all, is it a terrible idea to include him as a 3rd LB on the lists we have to put forward for rotation reasons with clichy and kolarov? just a thought make him work for his money