British jihadists killed in RAF drone strike

Oh wow, Muslim Council of Wales are denouncing this move as well. In other words, what he's doing in Syria is absolutely fine and hasn't done anything to the UK...
 
Oh wow, Muslim Council of Wales are denouncing this move as well. In other words, what he's doing in Syria is absolutely fine and hasn't done anything to the UK...

What he was doing in Syria was not fine, but whatever he was doing he was not doing it here and it's here where out jurisdiction begins and ends. He was not an enemy combatant as this country is not at war with ISIS, so the Muslim Council of Wales, and all of us for that matter, need to know on what basis this decision was made.

Cameron consulted the Solicitor General Robert Buckland, Tory MP for South Swindon on the legality of the attack and was told it was tickety-boo, it'll be interesting to find out what the legal justification was.
 
What he was doing in Syria was not fine, but whatever he was doing he was not doing it here and it's here where out jurisdiction begins and ends. He was not an enemy combatant as this country is not at war with ISIS, so the Muslim Council of Wales, and all of us for that matter, need to know on what basis this decision was made.

Cameron consulted the Solicitor General Robert Buckland, Tory MP for South Swindon on the legality of the attack and was told it was tickety-boo, it'll be interesting to find out what the legal justification was.

Is beheading legal?
 
The thing is we 'spotted' where he was, not perhaps causing us in the UK direct danger but he was actively encouraging others and if we'd left him alone he could have disappered and popped up on our centre circle one day.

He made his choice, they have no rules, we didn't really have an option.
 
What he was doing in Syria was not fine, but whatever he was doing he was not doing it here and it's here where out jurisdiction begins and ends. He was not an enemy combatant as this country is not at war with ISIS, so the Muslim Council of Wales, and all of us for that matter, need to know on what basis this decision was made.

Cameron consulted the Solicitor General Robert Buckland, Tory MP for South Swindon on the legality of the attack and was told it was tickety-boo, it'll be interesting to find out what the legal justification was.
You make some fair points but it is being framed as a preventive attack, as for not being enemy combatants they can't be because they belong to a terrorist organisation and western governments always class those as criminal organisations I am not really fussed to be honest the surviving ones will know now that this no game it's a well known policy (taken off the Isralies and copied by the Americans in Afghanistan) it tends to keep your enemies on their collective toes never knowing when the next missile will land
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.