British jihadists killed in RAF drone strike

Monkfish said:
I assume from that your anti a referendum on the EU, thats good we at least have some common ground
Click to expand...
I am yes. I believe the public are not well versed, on the whole, to understand the economic implications of leaving the EU.
 
Monkfish said:
yep I'll say it again we need to capture them and torture them live on Channel 5, that's the only way to stop extremists, we could have a new show called

'look out you Muslimsers, were even sicker fuckers than you'
Click to expand...
I'd prefer it if you didn't refer to ISIS as Muslims.

They also have beards, like Bill Oddie.

That's about the limit of the similarities of the groups of people mentioned.
 
foxy said:
Oh wow, Muslim Council of Wales are denouncing this move as well. In other words, what he's doing in Syria is absolutely fine and hasn't done anything to the UK...
Click to expand...

Why are they taking an interest?

Everyone knows ISIS and its activities are nothing to do with Islam.
 
No6 said:
Yeah, bombs are clever nowadays and their blast radius intelligently misses any innocent men, women and children. There's no way whatsoever that any innocent will get harmed. None. Nada. Zilch.

But it's alright, Germany and France will step in and pick up the pieces of the humanitarian catastrophe that will unfold. After all, it's not as if they opposed the initial military intervention against Assad (which helped in the spread of IS) or anything is it? ..... Oh...
Click to expand...
What about the innocent men women and Kurds being killed?

If these twats had caused another 7/7 would you have been at least pleased that due process had been attempted if a writ was issued against them?
 
The perfect fumble said:
What he was doing in Syria was not fine, but whatever he was doing he was not doing it here and it's here where out jurisdiction begins and ends. He was not an enemy combatant as this country is not at war with ISIS, so the Muslim Council of Wales, and all of us for that matter, need to know on what basis this decision was made.

Cameron consulted the Solicitor General Robert Buckland, Tory MP for South Swindon on the legality of the attack and was told it was tickety-boo, it'll be interesting to find out what the legal justification was.
Click to expand...
To quote someone fairly high up with maybe a little more knowledge than you of the subject:

"My first duty as Prime Minister is to keep the British people safe. That is what I will always do. There was a terrorist directing murder in our streets and no other means to stop them. But I am not prepared to stand here in the aftermath of a terrorist attack on our streets and have to explain why I did not take the chance to prevent it when I could have done."
 
If you are over there you in my eyes are a target, couldn't give a shit about the legalities of it, fight for ISIS, you are on the the list to die as far as I'm concerned, they aren't over there on some holiday, they are killing or going to kill people usually in horrible ways they don't even deserve a second thought, good riddance now let's get some more especially that **** Jihadi John.
 
Not sure "criminal organisations" is what you meant, but even if you did, crimes have to be commited within your jurisdiction for justice to be done.

As for "not really fussed", not this time maybe, but if we don't know what the legal justification was from the Solicitor General then what next? Popping radioactive poison in to some guys coffe because we consider him an enemy of the State? We take a rather dim view of that sort of thing, at least when it's done on our soil by agents of another country.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.