British jihadists killed in RAF drone strike

[hilts]

Yes, murder is murder no matter what. This isn't overly simplistic any more than saying red is red, City are City or hilts is hilts. It's just literally saying that thing is the thing that it is named after.

I could give more examples of things that are things but fear that it might take me a little while to cover them all.

Also, either make a point to argue or fuck off.

Ain't you a sweet heart, if you think murder is murder no matter what and all acts are morally the same then fair enough, it's not my fault you posted something without thinking and don't have the decency to admit the mistake, I could also tell you to fuck off but as a moderator showing no signs of rational thought I probably better not

 

[Ancient Citizen]

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...s-members-jihadists-syria-kill-list-ministers

Jeremy Corbyn leads cross-party group of MPs warning government has no legal basis for move as Lib Dem sources say they would have vetoed move in coalition

As the defence secretary Michael Fallon said ministers would not hesitate to approve further strikes against jihadis who have their own kill list, Jeremy Corbyn led a cross-party group of MPs who raised doubts about the change in strategy.

Corbyn said: “There has to be a legal basis for what’s going on. This is war without parliamentary approval. And in fact parliament specifically said no to this war in September 2013.”

Fair enough, it looks like he's come out.
I think he will now pay in heavy coin.

 

[sir baconface]

Christianity isn't a peaceful religion either, if you take the bible and try to apply what it says literally. Books written by men thousands of years ago should be no basis for how you live your life in modern society, and you certainly shouldn't be treating each and every word written in them as absolute truth and the only way of behaving. The bible, like the Quran I suspect (it's not a book I've read it has to be said!), advocates death for people who transgress in the most miniscule and insignificant of ways. Modern sensibilities allow us to filter this archaic nonsense, it's those who wilfully chose not to that are the problem. Those are the ones that make Islam a non-peaceful religion.

In which country are Christians currently murdering and raping in the name of their religion?

 

[Sir peace frog]

If he was a power mad career politician he would have made a move long ago, he may be delusion. But I believe he is 100% genuine in those beliefs, I actually have a lot of respect for the guy, we need more like him

hes a fucking politician the only thing he will believe in is himself and how he can make a few bob, just like the rest of them, imo :)

 

[hilts]

are you trying to claim he is not a career MP how many years has he been in Westminster? he has lacked ambition until now that point I will concede.

My definition of a career poltician and the widely accepted one is someone who will change beliefs to further his career, Corbyn is a man whose beliefs led him to be a politician, there are not too many about but some do get into it with good intentions

I think he is wrong but I respect that he has values

 

[Tbilisi]

Fair enough, it looks like he's come out.
I think he will now pay in heavy coin.

He will and rightly so

 

[SWP's back]

Go get em tiger!...

I feel safer already.

Yeah, yoy prefer this sort of thing don't you:

 

[SWP's back]

And how exactly will this solve problems?

I would say killing those planning attacks on the UK may well prevent those very attacks from taking place.

 

[hilts]

nobody in Syria can possibly be an imminent threat to the UK

if somebody in Syria is directing attacks on the UK then they must be communicating with the UK so why didn't we just intercept these communications and use the info to stop our homegrown terrorists?

haven't we royally fucked up here?
If you get toe cancer from a tumour in the leg you don't just chop the toe off. You try and stop the main cause of it. It's all good stoping the ones trying to do the actual dirty work but if they fail someone else will do it instead. It's better stoping them at the source isn't it not? Be it a drone or whatever.

Edit. I'm a shit quoter.

A scenario as some are struggling, let say the Welsh jihadist was n contact with someone in the UK to perform a terrorist act, we could then arrest those in the UK, fair enough, but what would Welsh jihadist do, give up, maybe he knows a couple if other people in the UK who are sympathetic, maybe he knows a dozen, maybe Cameron decided on this to put a doubt in other Muslim families going there

Maybe Cameron saved a 13 year old British kid getting raped by this action, maybe he didn't have any affect at all, but what has been lost?, the lives of two cunts

There are many other scenarios if one makes a little effort

One guy even managed poll ratings, I think most could do a lot better if they weren't to concerned in making political points

 

[sir baconface]

Is the Times arguing we should be honest and put boots on the ground instead? Is that what opponents of the drone attack think? Do any of you have a magic solution?