Here is how he and Paqueta compare this season:
Keep in mind the difference in teams, I believe Newcastle is slightly better than Westham, but Paqueta is also more of a #10, then an #8, while Guimareas is more of a pure #8.
Defense
What's interesting here is how dominant Paqueta is in tackling and aerials won for a midfielder, with the tradeoff for Guimaraes being better at making blocks and interceptions, and still a decent tackler. You can see Guimaraes height works against him and he won't be an asset in the air.
It's pretty even in this regard I think. Guimaraes being more overall a better defender, but his height works against him, which Paqueta excels at.
Passing + Chance Creation (xAG and SCA) + Goal Scoring (they are about equal in this one)
Paqueta is a little like KdB in this regard, as his passing completion % is very low, he goes for big time risky passes (which I think the eye test also proves), but then you see his xAG and SCA of 0.18 and 3.34... and these aren't great. The percentile for xAG is 90%, but this is in comparison to midfielders, it really goes down when compared to attacking midfielders. Comparitively Kevin is 0.76 and 6.52, and both are like the MAIN creator for their teams.
Guimaraes, who again is more of an #8, and not the main creator of Newcastle, has a slightly better pass completion, without sacrificing too much creativity, a slightly lower xAG of 0.14, but a higher SCA of 3.86 (perhaps a consequence of playing for Newcastle).
But also, Guimaraes surpasses Paqueta in progressive passes (slightly) and surprisingly, successful takeons (slightly).
Overall
I think other than the lack of height, Guimaraes is the
slightly better player over Paqueta, and is a better partner to Rodri for us. I was kinda surprised because going in I thought it would be Paqueta, but his creativity is about the same as Guimaraes even though his role requires him to be the main outlet (although it is Westham, so it balances out). Paqueta's pass completion is quite low for somebody not making enough chances (xAG or SCA).