Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 59,121
The notion that Dyson does anything that isn’t in Dyson’s best interest is fanciful. He doesn’t give a shit about anything else but himself.
One man’s ‘reduction’ is another’s ‘drag on growth’
As for the budget, it’s a simple calculation. The country needs investment in its public services and infrastructure. Failure to invest is also a drag on growth. That investment has to be in the form of increased taxes and borrowing. The focus of the taxes has been business and employer orientated and closing tax loopholes for wealthy landowners. Labour has to start somewhere and this budget is a reasonable first step.
The OBR forecast on reduced growth in the short term is also a simple calculation. Benefits from public investment is not immediate whereas tax raises feed into the system immediately. But we are in this situation because of our decade long failure to invest and voting for economic self harm. There is a price to be paid for short-sighted stupidity and I’m happy for the likes of Dyson to start paying it.
The notion that Dyson does anything that isn’t in Dyson’s best interest is fanciful. He doesn’t give a shit about anything else but himself.
We will never know if he would have invested in farming had this budget taken place before his first farm purchase, but my suspicion is that he wouldn’t.Maybe he has two passions money and farming. I do get where the cynicism comes from.
You still have to ask though if I inherit a £2m farm but want to work it then how do I pay the £400k IHT bill?
The reality is most farmers would sell up or certainly their families would upon inheritance and then who would buy the farm? More than likely it would be a major corporation or billionaire and so even more wealth and land passes to the 1%.
If I was a farmer today then I'd probably ring up Barratt Homes and get the inevitable over with.
It happens when there are tax rises in any sector.There's a headline in the ToryGraph this morning that purports Reeves to have said 'We can't allow farmers to die without paying tax.' I don't suppose those are her actual words but I suspect the sentiment is there. I also suspect that she, like a lot of MPs hasn't the slightest idea what farming, or business, for that matter, is about.
So you’re happy to sacrifice growth for what you see the bigger picture. I get the logic and time will tell if it’s the right thing.
There's a headline in the ToryGraph this morning that purports Reeves to have said 'We can't allow farmers to die without paying tax.' I don't suppose those are her actual words but I suspect the sentiment is there. I also suspect that she, like a lot of MPs hasn't the slightest idea what farming, or business, for that matter, is about.
Happy? No. Do we have a viable alternative? No.
The country needs public investment. Ironically, with Brexit it needs even more public investment as increased trade barriers not only reduce growth but incur costs.
Given your enthusiasm for reduced trade growth and trade barriers you should be delighted taxes were raised to help pay for it.