ManCitizens.
Well-Known Member
Maldeika said:ManCitizens. said:Point taken, but that doesn't answer my question. Why is it acceptable for Bayern to be commericially owned by 2 seperate entities purely to make money. Why is 1 individuals money wrong yet the money from Audi and Adidas is fine? Double standards.
No double standards - it is nothing else at the other Bundesliga clubs (apart from the clubs with other histories). 51 per cent of the shares and the controlling rights have to be in the hand of the club members.
It does not matter if it is an individual or another company - the 51 per cent are the stake.
And owned - they do not have to say anything - they just have a place in the controlling board - not in the club lead. It is an investment for Audi and Adidas - not much more (apart from showing their long lasting connection to the club, marketing or image reasons - the partnership between Adidas and Bayern lasts since 50 years...)
Bayern is owned 15-18% by 2 large corporations that could still comfortably make a profit even if Bayern went bust. They do not depend on Bayern and wouldn't give 2 shits if they dissapeared. I understand the hate with Hoffenheim etc, but selling a % to huge corporations who only want to make money should not be approved, if you truly support the fans philosophy that you hate Hoffenheim for. Not just when it suits your you and the rest of German footballs herd. If being owned by 1 man is wrong, so is accepting an external entities money. As i said, German football is full of hypocrites that choose who they love/hate.