nmc
Well-Known Member
26% and 75% ?
The discrepancy relates to people from Burnley having an extra finger
26% and 75% ?
By VAR I take it you mean Atwell, let’s name and shame the guilty parties, blaming VAR is like blaming a cooker for burning you lunch
It will only improve when they sack RileyQuite. There was a time when it was common for under-performing referees to be assessed and demoted to lower division games for a match or two. It doesn't seem to happen anymore. Thus, it appears to me that PGMOL refs are now untouchable and can more or less do what they want, or more likely what they're told, without any fear of reprisal. Probably the only job in the world where bad decisions and horrendous mistakes don't get questioned by Management. It stinks.
It will only improve when they sack Riley
47? We should be safe now!3-points, clean sheet, no injuries, 47 points in the bag, good result all round!
Joke?He reminds me of the Bernard Manning joke, ast any bisto? fuck off you Spanish ****
I know there will be no crowd booing, but "Sterling at Anfield" isn't three words that excite me.So did I mate! Set up a lot of good moves first half, just a shame he didn’t get another goal and one or two poor decisions in possession second half which is me being a bit of a nit picker.
I think he’ll be on the right Sunday, Foden left.
This is like one of those urban myths. No referee was ever demoted. Before VAR, the select group of refs would officiate in the PL one week & in the FL the next week. If a ref had had a poor game the press would come out with the "ref has been demoted" BS. Now, in normal times, they will ref 1 week & then be on VAR duties the next.Quite. There was a time when it was common for under-performing referees to be assessed and demoted to lower division games for a match or two. It doesn't seem to happen anymore. Thus, it appears to me that PGMOL refs are now untouchable and can more or less do what they want, or more likely what they're told, without any fear of reprisal. Probably the only job in the world where bad decisions and horrendous mistakes don't get questioned by Management. It stinks.
That's just my take on it over the years EL2. I've just never enjoyed us playing there, no special reason. They try and make it as difficult as they can, play shit football most of the time and generally try to clog us off the park. Hence, in my humble opinion when we go and play them, I never think it's going to be an easy game. No big deal.True. That 6-1 when we were 3 up after about ten minutes was really tricky as was the 6-0 in the third division. And what about last season when we were 4 up before they had a decent attack. It's not always an easy place to go, but to say it's never easy is ridiculous.
OK. Judging by your moniker I'll bow to your apparent inside knowledge.This is like one of those urban myths. No referee was ever demoted. Before VAR, the select group of refs would officiate in the PL one week & in the FL the next week. If a ref had had a poor game the press would come out with the "ref has been demoted" BS. Now, in normal times, they will ref 1 week & then be on VAR duties the next.
Upper shirt sleeve (think level with armpit) is not handball, and therefore is to be counted for offside. But it's not like the toe end of a boot - the dividing line between OK and not OK just can't be that precise.I can't grasp how an arm can be used, in the upper shirt sleeve area, as a part of Mahrez's body to judge offside, when if the ball hits the same location and goes in the goal it would be handball!
Can anyone explain, am I completely missing something that's recently been introduced?
Genuine attempt to play the ball only applies to fouls in the penalty area. If the foul is an attempt to play the ball, it's yellow rather than a red (if it is also when the fouled player is denied an obvious goalscoring opportunity). Last night's madness was two players sent off for trying not to foul a player - if they'd tried to foul the opponent and failed it would only have been yellow.All this about Ederson should have been sent off
unless I totally misunderstood what was said in the aftermath of the luiz red and martial dive.. even if it was denying a goal scoring opportunity.. which is stretching it a lot.. he wouldn’t have been sent off anyway cos he made an attempt to get the ball?
The only part of the body that doesn't count for offside is hand and arm (below shoulder level).The area between the chest and the shoulder is considered legal now as the the ball can connect as the same time in those areas.
Below the sleeve, iirc, is considered handball if deliberate.

Joke?
Upper shirt sleeve (think level with armpit) is not handball, and therefore is to be counted for offside. But it's not like the toe end of a boot - the dividing line between OK and not OK just can't be that precise.
Genuine attempt to play the ball only applies to fouls in the penalty area. If the foul is an attempt to play the ball, it's yellow rather than a red (if it is also when the fouled player is denied an obvious goalscoring opportunity). Last night's madness was two players sent off for trying not to foul a player - if they'd tried to foul the opponent and failed it would only have been yellow.
The only part of the body that doesn't count for offside is hand and arm (below shoulder level).
View attachment 9591