Burnley are predictable , set pieces and long ball will be there tactics , they will defend deep with ten behind the ball , absolutely no way will they attempt to take the game to us , Dyche only knows one way to play against the top teams. Expect 80% possession and hopefully an early goal to settle any nerves , the longer they defend and get their blocks and tackles in the more determined they will be , but after the Champs league defeat our players will be fully focused for our last three league games. Unless something stupid happens a sending off or a dodgy penalty then i cant't see our lads slipping up , Pep will have Burnley worked out and will play the right players and tactics. Dyche versus Pep a tactical mis-match.
agreed.
the only problem i see is what we do with our 80% possession, we can waste so much time pissing about sideways and backwards, our attempts vs. possession ratio must be the lowest in the league.
The best way to beat a team parking the bus is to flood the box and smash as many shots as possible low to the corners to score or create chances from spilled saves or to pump head high shots down the middle of the net for headers and deflections, and quicker diagonal through balls, being direct wears a team down.
yes i understand holding the ball and trying to draw a team out but that' not the best play here, our dropped points to "lesser" teams have originated from this.
We need 35 to 45 attempts to batter them, not like the eight attempts on 63% of the ball against united.
so often we give up our advantageous positions to pass back or sideways, allowing everyone to get back so we have to break down the whole team.
I read a good saying the other day:
"Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good" Does that not sum up a lot of our play?
or as Confucius said: "Better a diamond with a flaw than a pebble without."
not slagging one of the best teams on the planet, but improving should always be the goal, and implementing the above would be easy with the 68% to 80%
possession we will have in this one.