and like any other gift, it is useless if it is simply wasted (or worse) A lot of Burys problems are financial mismanagement so no matter how much you throw at them, if they don't use it sensibly you are throwing good money after bad.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Bury fans club AFC start a new life in NWCL
- Thread starter urban genie
- Start date
and like any other gift, it is useless if it is simply wasted (or worse) A lot of Burys problems are financial mismanagement so no matter how much you throw at them, if they don't use it sensibly you are throwing good money after bad.
M
M
mat
Guest
Wheres the fucking Nevilles?
Surely they'd be able to help their beloved club.
Surely they'd be able to help their beloved club.
RadcliffeRick
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Oct 2011
- Messages
- 9,177
- Location
- Kuala Lumpur Via Radcliffe
- Team supported
- Manchester City since 2008 Chelsea before that :-)
Too busy with their vanity project with the rest of the crass of 92.Wheres the fucking Nevilles?
Surely they'd be able to help their beloved club.
Dave Ewing's Back 'eader
Well-Known Member
Would Bury have saved us?
blue b4 the moon
Well-Known Member
End of thread.Would Bury have saved us?
Bluesince1979
Well-Known Member
Like the deal for Carrington. I dont know the specifics but isnt it minimal rent but Bury had to keep it in decent nick? Which they failed to do. You can only try and help .....and like any other gift, it is useless if it is simply wasted (or worse) A lot of Burys problems are financial mismanagement so no matter how much you throw at them, if they don't use it sensibly you are throwing good money after bad.
DT King of all Geordies
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Apr 2005
- Messages
- 589
I thought that when David Conn did his article in the Guardian about Bury talking about City's money. I thought he could have mentioned that two sons of Bury have financed a rival team. He could have also mentioned how his press colleagues virtually ignore Bury and other lower league whilst running stories galore about a club in a disproportionate manner. If we are having FPP then perhaps we should have FPC - Fair Press Coverage!Too busy with their vanity project with the rest of the crass of 92.
Manchester33
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Sep 2012
- Messages
- 6,911
Great logic that....Would Bury have saved us?
If you saw a puppy drowning in a river you should leave it... after all, that puppy wouldn't save you if roles were reversed.
Of course we should save Bury.
A great local club.
City and Bury have always got on.
Save them, and give them some of our younger players, and give them 1st team experience in the lower divisions.
We might even be able to get them promoted over time, and invest any future revenues in both clubs.
A great local club.
City and Bury have always got on.
Save them, and give them some of our younger players, and give them 1st team experience in the lower divisions.
We might even be able to get them promoted over time, and invest any future revenues in both clubs.
M
M
mat
Guest
https://www.efl.com/news/2019/july/efl-statement-bolton-wanderers-and-bury-fc/
Following extensive discussions with the Administrators of Bolton Wanderers, the ownership at Bury and the Professional Footballers’ Association (PFA) over the course of the weekend some progress has been achieved in regard to the respective challenges they currently face.
However, concerns do remain and both Clubs are required to provide confirmation to the League’s satisfaction that they can meet all outstanding commitments.
To give both Clubs the maximum opportunity to comply with the request, a deadline of 5pm on Monday 29 July has been set for them to provide the EFL with the necessary evidence. The 5pm cut-off point replaces the noon deadline issued to Bury, which was confirmed on Friday evening.
If the information is not received, the EFL Board is likely to suspend the opening day fixtures against Wycombe Wanderers (Bolton Wanderers) and MK Dons (Bury) under the provision of EFL Regulation 28.2.
The EFL will continue to offer its full assistance and support to both Clubs in order to achieve the objective of securing long-term futures for them but with the season now a matter of days away there is no other option but for all outstanding matters to be brought to a conclusion.
Following extensive discussions with the Administrators of Bolton Wanderers, the ownership at Bury and the Professional Footballers’ Association (PFA) over the course of the weekend some progress has been achieved in regard to the respective challenges they currently face.
However, concerns do remain and both Clubs are required to provide confirmation to the League’s satisfaction that they can meet all outstanding commitments.
To give both Clubs the maximum opportunity to comply with the request, a deadline of 5pm on Monday 29 July has been set for them to provide the EFL with the necessary evidence. The 5pm cut-off point replaces the noon deadline issued to Bury, which was confirmed on Friday evening.
If the information is not received, the EFL Board is likely to suspend the opening day fixtures against Wycombe Wanderers (Bolton Wanderers) and MK Dons (Bury) under the provision of EFL Regulation 28.2.
The EFL will continue to offer its full assistance and support to both Clubs in order to achieve the objective of securing long-term futures for them but with the season now a matter of days away there is no other option but for all outstanding matters to be brought to a conclusion.