Bury Thread

  • Thread starter Deleted member 77198
  • Start date
Seems the new vote has been rejected, AFC Bury seem to be making demands that Gigg lane be handed to them, Bury FC have to guarantee they won't apply for a league position and that the AFC board will run the club after a merger, that sounds more of a take over than a merger, still no end to this mess
 
Seems the new vote has been rejected, AFC Bury seem to be making demands that Gigg lane be handed to them, Bury FC have to guarantee they won't apply for a league position and that the AFC board will run the club after a merger, that sounds more of a take over than a merger, still no end to this mess
Both sides seem terrible at this 're-uniting the fans' business. They are expressing their fears and accusations in official public statements which in turn feeds the anger within both sets of supporters leading to more public negative discourse. I'd suggest they both STFU for a while and try and demonstrate that they can work together for the benefit of the fan base as a whole. It just looks like a complete shambles from the outside.
 
Both sides seem terrible at this 're-uniting the fans' business. They are expressing their fears and accusations in official public statements which in turn feeds the anger within both sets of supporters leading to more public negative discourse. I'd suggest they both STFU for a while and try and demonstrate that they can work together for the benefit of the fan base as a whole. It just looks like a complete shambles from the outside.
I think it is and I think the feelings run deep, I know lads who are members of both sides, it's toxic as fuck
 
Seems the new vote has been rejected, AFC Bury seem to be making demands that Gigg lane be handed to them, Bury FC have to guarantee they won't apply for a league position and that the AFC board will run the club after a merger, that sounds more of a take over than a merger, still no end to this mess
Has the vote taken place or do you mean the opportunity to vote again has been rejected?

Really can't see Bury being given a place in the league seeing it has been 2 / 3 seasons now - and would that mean only one team from the Conference going up? Can't see the Conferemce clubs being happy about that.
 
The vast majority of Bury fans want the clubs to merge and play at Gigg Lane under the Bury FC name. It’s the activists on both sides who have hijacked the campaign and made it toxic. They number a hundred or so against a fanbase of say 20,000. The other 19,900 wish they’d all STFU and common sense allowed itself to prevail.
 
The vast majority of Bury fans want the clubs to merge and play at Gigg Lane under the Bury FC name. It’s the activists on both sides who have hijacked the campaign and made it toxic. They number a hundred or so against a fanbase of say 20,000. The other 19,900 wish they’d all STFU and common sense allowed itself to prevail.
Good.

Let’s hope it does.
 
City have shown Saturday 3pm away games live inside the ground. So it’s possible they had permission off the relevant authorities.
They can show it on BeIN Sports. Long as they have the licence to show the game, they’re basically an entertainment hall
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.