dannybcity
Well-Known Member
shaundickov said:dannybcity said:shaundickov said:coleridge said:As a general point, why are so many of you desperate to be 'allowed' to use derogatory terms about other people. It's just plain weird.
Carol Thatcher sacked. Jonathan Ross suspended.
It's not about wanting to be allowed to use terms, it's about the RIDICULOUS notion that some offensive terms are deemed worthy of sacking, whilst others are not.
Ross 'offended' one man and apoligised, Thatcher offended a whole race and refused to apoligise.
Apoligised? How old are you? Am I arguing with a 10 year old in remedial school? FFS
Ross offended thousands of people, and generated far more complaints than Carol Thatcher did. Go back to your colouring in.
Even if you were I'd wager the 10 year old would win.
Ross didn't offend thousands, thousands offended themselves. Sachs accepted the apology and decided not to take the matter further, but that clearly wasn't good enough for you. So maybe it's time for you to tell me who the sensitive little flower is now?