mackenzie said:Blue2112 said:Oh it does matter, if were gonna be shit or were gonna be good then let it be without any past connection of Ragness, theres just no need ever for it in my book.
So you wouldn't mind us being shit just as long as it wasn't an "ex rag?"
Josh, you disappoint me.
Hughes aside, City should go for the best available regardless of any previous "connections."
Blue2112 said:For the first time in my life I'm calling him Sparky in a loving manner. Keep it up son your gonna make Christmas and New just year perfect.
From the moment you were rumoured to be a possible manager of our beautiful club I've hated you all the more than I ever did before.
I never wanted you because you were a Rag and I had the balls to say it at the time.
Although very few others have the balls to admit in public they don't want you because of your past at least I'm comforted in the knowledge that there is a deep resentment to you because the lack of vocal support you receive on a match to match basis proves to me that the vast majority of Blues can't and won't ever sing your name and therin lies the truth.
Think I'm about to get pissed so I'll raise my second glass since todays defeat to you and let us always remember....It would have been 5-0 but for you, you bastard.
rastus said:At the time he was a good choice, considering the realistic options we had.
He has however been poor, he may well be able to manage a Spar shop well, but is unable to transfer those skills to manage a Sainsburys.
Gus Hiddink, get in there boy.