CAS judgement: UEFA ban overturned, City exonerated (report out p603)

Keeper! said:
Basically yes, rags, Arsenal and Scousers they are the ones behind this, no doubt whatsoever about that.

Why would the PL want to join us in court and fight together in not wanting anything to be made public?

They are under huge pressure from the Yank clubs.
Click to expand...

Mate, they are the premier league. Why do you think United and Liverpool could interview Masters for his job, and orchestrated the hateful 8.
 
asahartford1 said:
Mate, they are the premier league. Why do you think United and Liverpool could interview Masters for his job, and orchestrated the hateful 8.
Click to expand...
The yank-owned clubs are probably just looking to engineer a pretext to flounce and join ESL. Not sure about the position of the German or Italian clubs, but here and in Spain the great historical clubs have reached the limit on their credit cards.
 
asahartford1 said:
Mate, they are the premier league. Why do you think United and Liverpool could interview Masters for his job, and orchestrated the hateful 8.
Click to expand...
Don't underestimate our influence and others like Villa and Everton, there is a growing realisation of what FFP means to ambitious clubs.

The Yanks and for that matter us made a major error in their tactics in trying to set up the Euro Super League, the Yanks got that very, very wrong, it was a huge wake up call for the other clubs and a reality check.
 
Keeper! said:
Don't underestimate our influence and others like Villa and Everton, there is a growing realisation of what FFP means to ambitious clubs.

The Yanks and for that matter us made a major error in their tactics in trying to set up the Euro Super League, the Yanks got that very, very wrong, it was a huge wake up call for the other clubs and a reality check.
Click to expand...
We didn't try to set up the ESL. We agreed to join when it had been set up.
 
The Appeal Court lists the various judgments around keeping the case private - including the Mail's getting the right to attend the appeal hearing.

Looks like we're paying the PL over half a million quid for their legal costs.

But I can't actually see the "merits judgment" that we wanted to keep private. But the publication (privacy) judgment says that because any future arbitration would be heard by independent arbitrators, the possibility of adverse comment would not be prejudicial to City (even if damaging to reputation) - but doesn't that mean the club is free to say in public what it likes about how crap the PL case is?

Manchester City FC -v- FA Premier League - Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

17 March 2021 – 20 July 2021 Between : Manchester City Football Club Ltd – Claimant – and – The Football Association Premier League Ltd – -Defendant Various Orders and Judgments by Mrs Justice Moulder Sir Geoffrey Vos, Master of the Rolls Sir Julian Flaux, Chancellor of the High Court Lord...
www.judiciary.uk www.judiciary.uk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.