CAS judgement: UEFA ban overturned, City exonerated (report out p603)

This has come back to life from Pep's press conference ric has posted a link on Twitter and he brings all of this up
 
Screenshot-20220508-085417-2.png
It's like we have a big game coming up!!!
 
Has this not been going for years…
Why are they only now appointing subject matter experts
Who the fuck has been running it til now

Exactly. But suppose for one moment it was true. Subject matter experts give opinion evidence not factual evidence and, as we know, opinions are like arseholes. So a) it would be interesting to know what they were opining on and b) we'll have a team of better experts giving the opposite opinion.

I wonder if Nick Harris has volunteered his "expert" services.
 

Pep needed to get that off his chest after a tough week. So so lucky to have this man in charge. A genuine rebel was needed to navigate the made up financial lies. The fact he stands up for our club against the onslaught is admirable and will never be forgotten.

The plan put in place by Khaldoon to bring Pep in to take over was a masterstroke.
 
I wish I could find a report that shows our annual prize money we have earns every season since the takeover and match it against our net transfer spend.
My prediction is there wouldn’t be a lot in it. If such a report could be generated it might shut a few anti City supporters up.
Not sure what that would prove to be honest.

Think of it like this. We get cash from TV prize money, matchday revenue and commercial income, plus what we get from player sales. Then we spend that on wages, operating and other costs. What cash we've got left is available to reinvest in the squad. The question then is, how much do we reinvest?

I've got some figures but need to rejig them slightly. But what they'll show is that we reinvest virtually all our spare cash in players, whereas Liverpool only reinvest around 80%.

Spurs' model seems to involve only spending on new players what they get from player sales so a lot of their spare cash isn't invested in their squad. I have a theory that they refused to sell Kane as they'd then have to spend all that money on new players, and Levy didn't want to do that. It'd be like when we sold SWP to Chelsea for £21m and bought Samaras for £5m.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.