CAS judgement: UEFA ban overturned, City exonerated (report out p603)

Has anyone seen any opinion on why the club put the PL investigation into the accounts? The Premier League never formally announced it did they? And neither have we. So why now? Are we throwing the PL under a bus that they are not communicating openly and honestly? Are we executing something that later on we can say, we were open about this? Pressure tactic possibly
 
Manchester1894 said:
Has anyone seen any opinion on why the club put the PL investigation into the accounts? The Premier League never formally announced it did they? And neither have we. So why now? Are we throwing the PL under a bus that they are not communicating openly and honestly? Are we executing something that later on we can say, we were open about this? Pressure tactic possibly
Click to expand...
It's another reflection of the open, true and accurate accounts published - though looking at all the Trafford and Kopite mouth foaming responses they have trouble processing the actual facts.

You have to include any averse potential actions on the horizon to give a full and accurate financial report.
The telling part as pointed out by various, is that there are no provisions made for a negative outcome on it. ie no funds set aside.

Perhaps Kopites would care to examine their last published accounts and look for any indications of warnings that 'they cannot compete' and the potential for FSG selling part/full amounts of their shares - I doubt there is any... which sort of indicates that their accounts are not an accurate reflection of reality, no?
 
Manchester1894 said:
Has anyone seen any opinion on why the club put the PL investigation into the accounts? The Premier League never formally announced it did they? And neither have we. So why now? Are we throwing the PL under a bus that they are not communicating openly and honestly? Are we executing something that later on we can say, we were open about this? Pressure tactic possibly
Click to expand...
It was actually also referenced last year - same language. Auditors/Audit Committee would have told them to put it in.
 
JASR said:
It's another reflection of the open, true and accurate accounts published - though looking at all the Trafford and Kopite mouth foaming responses they have trouble processing the actual facts.

You have to include any averse potential actions on the horizon to give a full and accurate financial report.
The telling part as pointed out by various, is that there are no provisions made for a negative outcome on it. ie no funds set aside.

Perhaps Kopites would care to examine their last published accounts and look for any indications of warnings that 'they cannot compete' and the potential for FSG selling part/full amounts of their shares - I doubt there is any... which sort of indicates that their accounts are not an accurate reflection of reality, no?
Click to expand...
Top post fella.
 
Manchester1894 said:
Has anyone seen any opinion on why the club put the PL investigation into the accounts? The Premier League never formally announced it did they? And neither have we. So why now? Are we throwing the PL under a bus that they are not communicating openly and honestly? Are we executing something that later on we can say, we were open about this? Pressure tactic possibly
Click to expand...
I thought it was because the judge decided it was in the public interest to state that there was an investigation ongoing awhile back, against both parties wishes. I wasn't aware that we'd put it in the last accounts though, so it looks like it's just an accounting requirement.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.