CAS judgement: UEFA ban overturned, City exonerated (report out p603)

[Newman Noggs]

on a serious note this must have cost city a pile of cash to cover the legal side so can we look at recovering costs

Not all our costs because if our appeal was against the non-co-operation charge as well as the main charge, we lost that part. I think they will be apportioned as the Court thinks fit.

 

[Semper aggressus]

Oh my stars! Just popped onto RAWK and it's a parallel universe.

First post I saw was a dig at Pep being classless, a decent player but at best only equal the manager Klopp is.
Next post denies he was a decent player.
Next post says he can't be Klopp's equal because Pep's a chequebook manager.

Thought it best not to read on.

The thing that surprises me most is how many scousers can write. Unless it's just a few with multiple accounts on that forum.

 

[jimmygrimblesboots]

So what's their next plan of attack?
The number of clubs we own?
Peps beard?
Covid vialotaions?

We are untouchable , today was the end game for UEFA , were Man City we do what we want :)

 

[Ric]

 

[jimmygrimblesboots]

The thing that surprises me most is how many scousers can write. Unless it's just a few with multiple accounts on that forum.

But have you noticed they only use crayons.

 

[Stoned Rose]

Amazed at how many Liverpool fans seem to be letting this judgment enormously upset them and destroy what is supposed to be the moment they've been desperately waiting for, for the past 30 years - winning the title.

The judgment isn't even about their club.

Seems that a lot of them are pretty obsessed with City these days ?

City Means More.

 

[@BluePhil8]

Amazed at how many Liverpool fans seem to be letting this judgment enormously upset them and destroy what is supposed to be the moment they've been desperately waiting for, for the past 30 years - winning the title.

The judgment isn't even about their club.

Seems that a lot of them are pretty obsessed with City these days ?

Rent free in their heads lol

They’re just sad and bitter because we pumped them 4-0 the match after they’d won it, they aren’t breaching 100 points, they aren’t winning multiple trophies this season, they can’t watch the players lift the trophy, no one gives a shit about the league this season because of Covid, they have to put an asterisk next to their title as a third of the games have been played behind closed doors, they have to live in Liverpool, they have to watch Henderson and Milner week in week out, no one else understands their accent and they are all inbreeding degenerates with a liking for violence.

 

[blueinsa]

The state of Slaphead Castles.


Duncan Castles
@DuncanCastles
·
2h
Court of Arbitration for Sport finds Manchester City to be in breach of UEFA Financial Fair Play rules, but lifts European competition ban and reduces fine to €10million.



Duncan Castles
@DuncanCastles
·
2h
Manchester City's €10m CAS-reduced fine for breaching Financial Fair Play rules converts to slightly more than the 'Etihad direct contribution for £8m' on the day this email was sent regarding the Abu Dhabi-owned club's '£88.5m' '13/14 sponsorship fee'.

His jawdropping claim that City were still in breach of FFP is surely sufficient to get the lawyers after the bitter cunnt.

This is exactly what our lawyers need to clamp down on.

MANCHESTER CITY FC DID NOT DISGUISE EQUITY FUNDING AS SPONSORSHIP CONTRIBUTIONS

Read that Castles you Qatar fucking lackey.

 

[chaddblue]

The thing that surprises me most is how many scousers can write. Unless it's just a few with multiple accounts on that forum.

They’re like the rags

On one hand they say we’re a small insignificant club that mean nothing

On the other hand they obsess about us 24/7 and we make their piss boil more than any other club ever has

 

[nijinsky69]

Don't see how we can appeal because we made it clear that we were not co-operating because we didn't trust the UEFA process. It was a clever tactical move. We are guilty of non-cooperation, whatever the rights and wrongs of the process.

I don’t think we would win on the substantive decision but we could challenge the size of the fine as disproportionate against a background of leaks etc. It’s not about the money - its about sending a message to these twats.