CAS judgement: UEFA ban overturned, City exonerated (report out p603)

You are correct. Where an obligation exists to co-operate with investigators it is not for the subject of the investigation to decide whether or not to co-operate. It's an allegation it's very difficult to lose on and we never denied it anyway but simply offered mitigation.

If you think about it, if non-co-operation was permitted, those who were up to no good would never co-operate thus denying investigators evidence they are entitled to. So whilst we had good trust-related (and probably commercial) reasons not to co-operate, it would be an exceptional ruling to find in our favour. I think that will go to costs but @Shads may be correct as regards arbitration. I've only been involved in High Court proceedings.

It could also be said that they knew - and didnt need our input - that they were out of time and yet proceeded to drag our name through costs and ensure we spent a kings ransom on legal fees.
All things considered why should we not be permitted to claim these back. They KNEW they were out of time. It was a waste of our time, CAS time and their own time.
Not only should we be able to claim costs but we should now seek recompense for reputational damage.
 
I hope they do too, it’d be hilarious

Not a chance for 2 reasons.


1 .Both parties have to agree that an arbitration result at CAS is final, and legally binding before the process can even begin.Hence why City would not have actually challenged the ruling it self,had we lost.But gone after FFP in the higher Courts.

2. UEFA didn't event abide by their own statue of limitations ffs.

Not a Leg to stand on.
 
Well done Blues, it's great to see and feel there is still passion for our club. Especially after recent events with many fans saying they've had enough with VAR etc.

CTID
 
It could also be said that they knew - and didnt need our input - that they were out of time and yet proceeded to drag our name through costs and ensure we spent a kings ransom on legal fees.
All things considered why should we not be permitted to claim these back. They KNEW they were out of time. It was a waste of our time, CAS time and their own time.
Not only should we be able to claim costs but we should now seek recompense for reputational damage.

Absolutely agree. It's a bit of a technical issue anyway but someone did ask. The point is, we're laughing.
 
CdsZn5R.gif


UEFA and the haters today.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.