CAS judgement: UEFA ban overturned, City exonerated (report out p603)

[old blue]

..as soon as he states that "disagreeing with the rules is no justification for obstructing investigators", you just know that he's ignoring facts in favour of talking out of his shitter... saved me having to bother reading the rest of it though, so thanks for that you squeaky voiced nork.

Was it the spitmeister a few years back that rang Talk Sport and harangued one of their presenters for having the temerity to criticise him. How dare the presenter use his position unfairly, not allowing any redress. I heard the playback on here and it was like listening to a school of dolphins.

 

[M18CTID]

Oh I'll certainly be heading back for a final visit at some point soon. I do have a login there. I thought they'd banned me after my last outburst but it still worked a little while back.

It’s a good job you don’t live in Oslo. The moderators would’ve torched your house by now.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

Was it the spitmeister a few years back that rang Talk Sport and harangued one of their presenters for having the temerity to criticise him. How dare the presenter use his position unfairly, not allowing any redress. I heard the playback on here and it was like listening to a school of dolphins.

Thought he was entitled to call Durham out on that occasion.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

It’s a good job you don’t live in Chelsea. The locals would’ve torched your house by now.

 

[MillisleBlue]

What a week this has been in the rise and rise of Manchester City Football Club. We've won a very big battle but the war continues unabated. No doubt the cowards with the ability of orchestrating this smear campaign and ongoing hatred of our Club are still skulking in the shadows and will be back for more. I hope we remain vigilant.

CTIFD

 

[bluemanchester]

You’d have thought having evidence that is in no way valid would be a bit of a sticking point when bringing a case. But no, you’d be wrong.

Also note how he uses the exact same words as Klopp, ex-Dortmund. Shows how they are all colluding, whispering, to bring this smear campaign upon us.

"Celebration should be forbidden".

Takes one back to the 1930s Germany. Some of them never change.

 

[RobinHood]

Extract:

... Its a strange attitude to take from sections of a fanbase that were accused of something by the media,and a whole host of others,that they were later cleared of...

Very good analogy.

 

[domalino]

@projectriver I don't know if you said this or someone else, but is it true that UEFA's time-bar is built around EU law and limitation periods?

So these are not arbitrary rules, they actually make UEFA comply with EU law, because if UEFA tried to take action against someone outside the EU limitation period, a club could just appeal to an EU court and have it thrown out, the same way Bosman overruled FIFA/UEFA rules?

If this is true it feels like a fairly significant talking point that City should be putting out there to silence the technicality/"UEFA let them off with shitty rules" narrative.

 

[spiny]

We have been told for years that City have no fans. Lots of our supporters are now accussed of being ignorant and beligerent.

they can't have it both ways ...
... or are we not really here?

 

[slbsn]

@projectriver I don't know if you said this or someone else, but is it true that UEFA's time-bar is built around EU law and limitation periods?

So these are not arbitrary rules, they actually make UEFA comply with EU law, because if UEFA tried to take action against someone outside the EU limitation period, a club could just appeal to an EU court and have it thrown out, the same way Bosman overruled FIFA/UEFA rules?

not me and likely Swiss not European law but statutes of limitation exist in every territory. This idea that this is some odd quirk Of FFP or UEFA is typically laughable