Colin Bells Boots
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 19,242
- Team supported
- Manchester City
I am sure I have read something in the past about City taking Eufa to Court.)
And suing them for £50million ?
I am sure I have read something in the past about City taking Eufa to Court.)
That's an excellent suggestion, why hasn't anyone ever considered that before ;)And suing them for £50million ?
You can always be relied on to bring some levity to the thread.Dose anyone know if are lawyers costs, were paid by UEFA or not. If not that will means that we will have to pay our own costs.
If that I the case then we should sue UEFA,for both libel and slander. We should sue them for whatever our lawyers think we could screw UEFA for. If they don't want to pay any damages, then we will except that every board in UEFA must resign on mass.
Give them that ultimatum, pay damages or a clean sweep of all UEFA boards and officials. There must not be one person there by the end of January 21. This should give them enough time to hold elections for all the UEFA positions. Any existing UEFA members are hard for life from all UEFA positions.
Dose anyone know if are lawyers costs, were paid by UEFA or not. If not that will means that we will have to pay our own costs.
If that I the case then we should sue UEFA,for both libel and slander. We should sue them for whatever our lawyers think we could screw UEFA for. If they don't want to pay any damages, then we will except that every board in UEFA must resign on mass.
Give them that ultimatum, pay damages or a clean sweep of all UEFA boards and officials. There must not be one person there by the end of January 21. This should give them enough time to hold elections for all the UEFA positions. Any existing UEFA members are hard for life from all UEFA positions.
King Kev, I used to think the lights were on but nobody was at home. Now I'm convinced the house is in complete darkness.Probably waiting for the group stages of the Champions League to start. Then there will be complaining about pens not being given. Opponents not being either booked or sent off. How the ref is bent as a 9 Bob note To those who don't know what a 9 Bob not is ask your parents or your grandparents. They should be able to tell you what that means.
www.archysport.com
I'm always interested to see why a dormant thread has popped in to a higher position. Most times there's some great humor or interesting nugget of knowledge. What a disappointment when I read this post !Dose anyone know if are lawyers costs, were paid by UEFA or not. If not that will means that we will have to pay our own costs.
If that I the case then we should sue UEFA,for both libel and slander. We should sue them for whatever our lawyers think we could screw UEFA for. If they don't want to pay any damages, then we will except that every board in UEFA must resign on mass.
Give them that ultimatum, pay damages or a clean sweep of all UEFA boards and officials. There must not be one person there by the end of January 21. This should give them enough time to hold elections for all the UEFA positions. Any existing UEFA members are hard for life from all UEFA positions.
Come on, get up to date.Probably waiting for the group stages of the Champions League to start. Then there will be complaining about pens not being given. Opponents not being either booked or sent off. How the ref is bent as a 9 Bob note To those who don't know what a 9 Bob not is ask your parents or your grandparents. They should be able to tell you what that means.
I find it interesting that as well as claiming to have visited East Germany many times which hasn't existed for 30 years (I honestly had him down as about 14), he now knows what a 9 Bob note means.Come on, get up to date.
It's now a 45p piece.
;-)
I didn't know there was someone else on trial with him. I hope it's just the translation but that was horrible to read.Meanwhile the Rui Pinto hearing rumbles on with no coverage in the UK press. Despite their hysterical pre-trial stories throwing more mud at City the English media are now ignoring the case. Perhaps because it doesn't seem to be going well for their hero Pinto.
Porto-supporting Pinto's latest ploy has been to try and have the Judge removed because he is "a fervent Benfica fan."
Rui Pinto's defense asks for removal of judge Paulo Registo | Football Leaks - Archysport
Rui Pinto’s defense requested the removal of Judge Paulo Registo from the trial of…www.archysport.com
He'll have to do better than that.
It's hard to follow the translated version but I think one of Pinto's lawyers is also on trial. The extortion allegation centres on a blackmail attempt against one of his victims (I think officials of Sporting Lisbon). A demand was made for 500,000 Euros (not to leak their hacked data) and his lawyer went to the pick-up meeting at a motorway service station. But the whole incident was under surveillance and on tape. The lawyer was arrested there and Pinto was arrested later.I didn't know there was someone else on trial with him. I hope it's just the translation but that was horrible to read.
Doyen Sports, not Sporting Lisbon.It's hard to follow the translated version but I think one of Pinto's lawyers is also on trial. The extortion allegation centres on a blackmail attempt against one of his victims (I think officials of Sporting Lisbon). A demand was made for 500,000 Euros (not to leak their hacked data) and his lawyer went to the pick-up meeting at a motorway service station. But the whole incident was under surveillance and on tape. The lawyer was arrested there and Pinto was arrested later.
It's a very complex case with more than 120 witnesses due to be called. Some of the recent evidence has been about the hacking of Real Madrid but it has mostly been ignored by the media. I wonder why.
Thanks. I think Doyen Sports had clients at Sporting Lisbon amongst others. The Real Madrid stuff has been in the Portugese media in the last couple of months. See belowDoyen Sports, not Sporting Lisbon.
I didn't know Real Madrid had been hacked, is that where they got the Ronaldo emails? I'd presumed it was from his agent(s). I wonder how much dirt they've got on RM and why nothing has surfaced?
Ahh, it was the Ronaldo tax dodging emails, not 'the other ones'. Real Madrid blame him for Ronaldo leaving, whoops. Cheers for that, all very interesting.Thanks. I think Doyen Sports had clients at Sporting Lisbon amongst others. The Real Madrid stuff has been in the Portugese media in the last couple of months. See below
Sports Finding - Latest Football, Tennis & General Sports News
Latest Football, Tennis & General Sports Newssportsfinding.com
It's not clear if Real Madrid are involved in any of the 90 criminal charges made against Pinto but they are apparently trying to take action against Pinto for hacking their data.
The worst part of all this is I don't think the City emails form any part of Pinto's trial but the UK media have tried to use it as a stick against City and ignored the much bigger story.
The BBC did an inaccurate Pinto pre-trial story on their website making false allegations against City by stating that the leaked data included information about "Gulf Arab individuals influencing football clubs."
The Pinto data leak is nothing to do with so called "Gulf Arabs" (a racist term in this context) and so far the BBC has not published a single paragraph on the ongoing hearing which has been running for two months.
I make that about £50m English pounds, yes?It's hard to follow the translated version but I think one of Pinto's lawyers is also on trial. The extortion allegation centres on a blackmail attempt against one of his victims (I think officials of Sporting Lisbon). A demand was made for 500,000 Euros (not to leak their hacked data) and his lawyer went to the pick-up meeting at a motorway service station. But the whole incident was under surveillance and on tape. The lawyer was arrested there and Pinto was arrested later.
It's a very complex case with more than 120 witnesses due to be called. Some of the recent evidence has been about the hacking of Real Madrid but it has mostly been ignored by the media. I wonder why.
It's hard to follow the translated version but I think one of Pinto's lawyers is also on trial. The extortion allegation centres on a blackmail attempt against one of his victims (I think officials of Sporting Lisbon). A demand was made for 500,000 Euros (not to leak their hacked data) and his lawyer went to the pick-up meeting at a motorway service station. But the whole incident was under surveillance and on tape. The lawyer was arrested there and Pinto was arrested later.
It's a very complex case with more than 120 witnesses due to be called. Some of the recent evidence has been about the hacking of Real Madrid but it has mostly been ignored by the media. I wonder why.