CAS judgement: UEFA ban overturned, City exonerated (report out p603)

[DenisLawBackHeel74]

I don't often do this but that BBC article has annoyed me enough to make a complaint. It's completely unacceptable that some bitter rag/dipper on their sportsdesk can get away with such a transparently biased article on a supposedly impartial public broadcast service and it's the main article no less.

If you also want to let them what you think
https://www.bbc.co.uk/contact/complaints/make-a-complaint

Copy and paste this link into the text box for reference
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/53571659

submitted my complaint.

I would encourage every right minded city fan to do the same.

 

[kaz7]

Love page 29 and section 52 regarding the impartiality

Can you post it please

 

[Jam Tomorrow]

So the hateful eight was really the nasty nine. Well fuck them, they lost, we won. City were basically the old bloke refusing to cooperate with Harold Shipman. The BBC are a bunch of cuunts, they obviously expected us to lose, then it would have been Armageddon, instead they have to continue spinning half truths. Wankers.

 

[Dave Ewing's Back 'eader]

another cnutish outfit looking for a fucking ban

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/53571659

Biased Bullshitting Canutes. We should be able to opt in and out of the licence fee! I'd be out in a trice.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

submitted my complaint.

I would encourage every right minded city fan to do the same.

Absolute fucking waste of time.

 

[Jacko1956]

C helsea
U inted
N ewcastle
T ottenham
s
B urnley
A rsenal
W olves
L iverpool/Leicester

If only Sheffield United had joined in and Liverpool fell into the Irish sea

Well what a set of tossers they look now !

 

[Blueknows]

I know my eyesight is failing but I am sure I read somewhere in the verdict that CAS mentions the fact that one of emails used as evidence was actually two emails doctored and made to look as one. Nick Harris suggests that isn’t the case and all emails were authentic. Am I going mad or is he, as I presume, being economical with the truth?

 

[chesterbells]

But all of that is so massively open to interpretation. Are the German clubs really getting fair value from their sponsors/owners? If so, why is their relative commercial income so much higher than any other league, even though their domestic league isn't viewed anywhere near as widely? Is Audi giving Bayern Munich €50-60m a year to not have their name on the shirt really fair value? And why in the Middle East is any other company from the same country accused of being a "related party," whereas with American owners, the sponsor can be owned by the best friend of the club owner and give them an unprecedented kit deal from a company that no-one ever fucking heard of (and has coincidentally now disappeared, proving what a great bit of marketing that clearly was), and that's just considered a good use of business contacts.

Absolutely

 

[bluwes]

Haha.

Think most of us will be by tonight

 

[Boris Becker’s Backhand]

I don't often do this but that BBC article has annoyed me enough to make a complaint. It's completely unacceptable that some bitter rag/dipper on their sportsdesk can get away with such a transparently biased article on a supposedly impartial public broadcast service and it's the main article no less.

If you also want to let them what you think
https://www.bbc.co.uk/contact/complaints/make-a-complaint

Copy and paste this link into the text box for reference
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/53571659

I annoy the cvnts by wearing my Israel cap when I’m out and about in media city - they don’t seem to like it