Point them to this article. They might struggle as it doesn't have a lot of pictures though. He's a barrister and not, as far as I'm aware, a City fan.
https://www.footballlaw.co.uk/articles/mcfc-v-uefa-rubbish-in-rubbish-out
To take the German military theme further, a German strategist described "war as the continuation of politics by other means". I suspect there's a small group acting in concert but they don't need to be briefed. They are effectively acting in the interest of rival clubs but they are not puppets, they are motivated by the English liberals distaste for the Arab Sheikh. Unfortunately for the Western missionary, the native decided that Einstein and Maxwell had more to offer than the holy ghost, and they're now building spaceships to Mars and nuclear power stations whilst Research England has a partner in Mubadala.I am trying to widen my perspective when looking at everything which is going on.
Everything which is currently happening is perfectly logical from a historic perspective.
Ray Dalio has been publishing articles and encouraging people to look in this manner with his work on the 'changing world order' and a similar thing is certainly happening in football. When the existing elite are threatened by a rising power, they use protectionist measures to maintain their advantage. Dalio states that in these situations the eventual result is often war or large-scale conflict, which appears to be the present situation regarding City and the widespread media and institutional attacks.
In this context, the current media attacks must be considered organised and planned. This is a relatively cheap way of maintaining power and attacking the rising power. Presently there appears to be a campaign to cast doubt on the validity of City's CAS appeal. I can not help thinking that certain journalists are being heavily influenced and briefed!
Watch out. Der spiegel might publish this revelation in its comic and then you could be investigated by the secret police and charged, sentenced and imprisoned. You must be guilty of arson, even if there is no fire at the Der Spiegel offices? Isn't that the logic of the media?I’m off to Hamburg in December for a few nights and it just so happens that Der Spiegel have an office near my hotel.
I might torch the fucking place!
I'm not clued up on all this. What's the best retort to the rags who are saying something dodgy has definitely happened and there is no agenda?
I've already gone down the fuck off you rag ****s route. I want something more informed and articulated.
I'm not clued up on all this. What's the best retort to the rags who are saying something dodgy has definitely happened and there is no agenda?
I've already gone down the fuck off you rag ****s route. I want something more informed and articulated.
@projectriver not doing a write up. He has no need. I've not said it recently but thanks for your brilliant work on this. Saw yesterday that some on here yesterday were having a pop as well. Pathetic.
From the linked article the final section is brilliant and particularly the last paragraph I've bolded:
Significance of the CAS Decision
Following the release of the CAS Decision news reporters and fans were decrying “the end of FFP”. The CAS Decision does not signify that. More particularly, despite the CAS Panel’s comments on the drafting of the limitation period stated in article 37 PRCFCB, there is nothing negative stated about UEFA’s CLFFPR or its procedures. The CAS Decision, if anything, is a rousing call for clubs to give greater support and cooperation to the CFCB when it is the subject of an investigation or charge under the CLFFPR and PRCFCB.
On the point of article 37 PRCFCB – although UEFA will not see it this way considering the overall outcome – it is welcomed that there is now some clear authority on the interpretation of the same. Whilst I would agree with Professor Jack Anderson’s comment that the CAS Panel’s interpretation of article 37 PRCFCB included ‘no reference to previous CAS cases, Swiss law or comparative law’, the interpretation provided by the CAS Panel, in this author’s opinion, is fitting. UEFA may adopt such an interpretation in future editions of the PRCFCB, or may draft a limitation clause to reflect the AC Decision and UEFA’s submissions to the CAS Panel (i.e. that time stops on the date the IC opens its investigation, not when a referral decision is issued as decided by the CAS Panel).
Nevertheless, in this author’s opinion, having now read the CAS Decision, this entire dispute appears over-hyped and demonstrative of an element of desperation from UEFA to pin a charge on MCFC. The absence of cogent evidence from UEFA / the CFCB is astounding and this author is in disbelief that the AC Decision, let alone the Referral Decision, was made on the basis of the evidence available. Neither the CAS nor the purpose and aim of the CLFFPR should be undermined for the CFCB’s decision to proceed with a case that could not be properly proved. Admittedly, however, one upshot of that could be that clubs will be even more vigilant in ensuring their compliance with the CLFFPR to avoid being ardently pursued by UEFA.
Point them to this article. They might struggle as it doesn't have a lot of pictures though. He's a barrister and not, as far as I'm aware, a City fan.
https://www.footballlaw.co.uk/articles/mcfc-v-uefa-rubbish-in-rubbish-out
I’m surprised that none of them has pointed out that the queen mother may have shot JFK, as we haven’t seen any concrete evidence that she was somewhere else at the time!Watch out. Der spiegel might publish this revelation in its comic and then you could be investigated by the secret police and charged, sentenced and imprisoned. You must be guilty of arson, even if there is no fire at the Der Spiegel offices? Isn't that the logic of the media?
Lode.Morning all, just did a quick circuit of the papers and none have picked up the Guardians latest piece of shit from Der Nazi. The tossers at Nazi have basically been made to look cuunts, they had the mother load that turned into a damp squib. The world moves on, fuck off Nazi.