Oh they would. They are probably counting on the evidence of a decade of weakness in defending the club’s reputationI assume there's not much City can do about it, I doubt the DM would be dumb enough to print this if they thought they were susceptible to legal action.
Oh they would. They are probably counting on the evidence of a decade of weakness in defending the club’s reputation
Blocked by the courts, not City. We refused to engage with them previously and they decided unilaterally not to risk publicationUnfortunately the weakness you're talking about only exists in the paranoid minds of bluemoon posters who like to pretend the club does nothing to protect itself.
In the real world we've had plenty of journalists say they were blocked from running stories by City's legal department, including the Mail reporters on this story.
They call it a dramatic dispatch from their reportet published four days after the Court Judgement itself which reveals all the details.The Daily United hatchet job. The rag and it’s journalists have been building up to this.
View attachment 21886
The Daily United had the only reporter in court.
Are City finally going to ban this Rag fanzine piece of sh*t from the Etihad once and for all?
You absolute c*nts!