would barca go for this type of deal though with fabregas would thought they would want more money down payment ?tolmie's hairdoo said:fbloke said:£50m limit will be the amortised value.
Otherwise it makes no sense for FFP calcs as we would, if the players sign 5 year deals, have £10m outlay for FFP.
Also, as UEFA have alrady allowed us to 'disallow' incentive payments for players in calcs then they could not stop us from saying to a club that we pay £5m year one and if he plays 1 minute of football in years 1 and 2 a final payment of £45m is paid in year 3.
This is what could happen.
We could pay a significant loan facility payment this season, and settle the balance next term, with it coming off the price tag.
Makes no difference, we get around the cap.
fbloke said:NipHolmes said:Davs 19 said:I thought we made an offer but they turned it down ? Could well be wrong though.....
Pretty sure Oldham have NOT been paid. Sjk008/Ste the resident Oldham fan is always pining on about how Oldham need the cash and how he hopes he gets sold for 10m.
I am very, very confident that a deal was brokered.
yellamcfc said:tolmie's hairdoo said:fbloke said:£50m limit will be the amortised value.
Otherwise it makes no sense for FFP calcs as we would, if the players sign 5 year deals, have £10m outlay for FFP.
Also, as UEFA have alrady allowed us to 'disallow' incentive payments for players in calcs then they could not stop us from saying to a club that we pay £5m year one and if he plays 1 minute of football in years 1 and 2 a final payment of £45m is paid in year 3.
This is what could happen.
We could pay a significant loan facility payment this season, and settle the balance next term, with it coming off the price tag.
Makes no difference, we get around the cap.
In regards to FFP, does it mean that we have to disclose any transfer fee's, ins & outs?
fbloke said:£50m limit will be the amortised value.
Otherwise it makes no sense for FFP calcs as we would, if the players sign 5 year deals, have £10m outlay for FFP.
Also, as UEFA have alrady allowed us to 'disallow' incentive payments for players in calcs then they could not stop us from saying to a club that we pay £5m year one and if he plays 1 minute of football in years 1 and 2 a final payment of £45m is paid in year 3.
manimanc said:Any developments on fabregas yet?
jimbopm said:fbloke said:£50m limit will be the amortised value.
Otherwise it makes no sense for FFP calcs as we would, if the players sign 5 year deals, have £10m outlay for FFP.
Also, as UEFA have alrady allowed us to 'disallow' incentive payments for players in calcs then they could not stop us from saying to a club that we pay £5m year one and if he plays 1 minute of football in years 1 and 2 a final payment of £45m is paid in year 3.
If this is true then we would have to factor in players signed like Fernandinho, Navas, Negredo and Jovetic all of whom will have amortized values entering this season. It can't work both ways.
fbloke said:jimbopm said:fbloke said:£50m limit will be the amortised value.
Otherwise it makes no sense for FFP calcs as we would, if the players sign 5 year deals, have £10m outlay for FFP.
Also, as UEFA have alrady allowed us to 'disallow' incentive payments for players in calcs then they could not stop us from saying to a club that we pay £5m year one and if he plays 1 minute of football in years 1 and 2 a final payment of £45m is paid in year 3.
If this is true then we would have to factor in players signed like Fernandinho, Navas, Negredo and Jovetic all of whom will have amortized values entering this season. It can't work both ways.
We have a deal in place that is for this year and next now.
UEFA cannot have their cake and eat it.
BringBackSwales said:Disappointing, if true, to hear that proposed potential transfer details are still leaking out of City, really disappointing