Champions League ban?

Anyone know when we get the result of the "concrete" case , if its before the next Champs league home game , the booing will build to a crescendo
I forgot about it yesterday. No idea. I forget the words the UEFA President used but I think it was soon or very soon, or something to that effect.
 
I forgot about it yesterday. No idea. I forget the words the UEFA President used but I think it was soon or very soon, or something to that effect.
Wasn't the wording rather "if there is a concrete case, .." or something like that?
 
As others have said, I think the word "concrete" has been lost in translation because unless UEFA have found some real smoking gun evidence that we're all unaware of, there's fuck-all concrete about the DS/Football Leaks allegations. When referring to "concrete case", I'd hazard a guess that Ceferin meant "specific case"
 
As others have said, I think the word "concrete" has been lost in translation because unless UEFA have found some real smoking gun evidence that we're all unaware of, there's fuck-all concrete about the DS/Football Leaks allegations. When referring to "concrete case", I'd hazard a guess that Ceferin meant "specific case"
I believe that as well. After everyone picked up on Martin Ziegler’s somewhat hysterical story & rewrote it without question, David Conn went out and established the truth, which was somewhat less newsworthy.

This is what many journalists do; pick up on a word or phrase taken out of context or twist something to their own version of the truth. Others then pick up on this and adapt it for their own ends. When the same story is in 6 or 7 different papers, people assume it’s true because every journalist has been briefed by a source. Yet mostly it’s because they’ve just copied and embellished one journalist’s story, which may not in itself be true.
 
I believe that as well. After everyone picked up on Martin Ziegler’s somewhat hysterical story & rewrote it without question, David Conn went out and established the truth, which was somewhat less newsworthy.

This is what many journalists do; pick up on a word or phrase taken out of context or twist something to their own version of the truth. Others then pick up on this and adapt it for their own ends. When the same story is in 6 or 7 different papers, people assume it’s true because every journalist has been briefed by a source. Yet mostly it’s because they’ve just copied and embellished one journalist’s story, which may not in itself be true.

In essence no different from women tittle-tattling in their housecoats on front steps.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.