Blu3m00n91
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 19 Oct 2012
- Messages
- 3,518
Fuck off again you red ****Another 500m expenditure?
Fuck off again you red ****Another 500m expenditure?
How is that not a fair competitive dig? I’m sorry i don’t accept failure.Lol ban this dipper!
The tactics led to a whole series of simple counter-attacks and they wouldBest team won.
Too many players were poor.
Nothing to do with tactics.
Tuchel has Pep’s number here.
Even with Zinch, Foden, Gundog, didn’t create nay a ripple of improvement. I hate to say this but it does really feel that Tuchel and chelsea have made a lot of effort and maybe technology in AI machine learn our tactic as a team and as individual players.
I’m not at all surprised if he lost against the lower teams but keeps on winning against us. If I were Tuchel new to the job, of course the first team that I want to deviscerate and analyse every granular detail will be us, Manchester City. He wants to win the league next year.
I have a bad feeling about the CL final, and this will keep me flapping to no end.
The way he’s played against us, that is more than chance. I have a feeling, and AIML is my area, that he has brought in AIML to data mine how our players play.
Because the difference between Pep and other coaches is that Pep has a rigid system. A brilliant and effective one, but a rigid one. Rigid systems are the easist to mine because the probability of chance is very low.
And a rigid system has a formula, or in my field an algorithm. Crack that formula and the weaknesses get found out.
Imagine how chess grandmasters get beat by AI, or Go grandmasters get bet by AI.
What I saw today was chelsea players knowing when to overcome our press and our patterns of passing. Its by no means perfect from chelsea, but it is stubborn.
What Pep has to do now is to read how Tuchel reads us. We won’t be able to read it from chelsea playing against other teams, because his tactic today was specifically for us. Hence why I believe Tuchel has got Pep’s number. Not by chance, but by hardwork in analysing our formula.
Another 500m expenditure?