Champions League Games 5/6 March

[mat]

Ramos must feel like a right twat now.

 

[Blue Hefner]

Thought it had to be a clear error. If it takes longer than a minutes its obviously not a clear error.

Like someone said behind me at the game - if it takes them this long to get t right with a monitor, have they been guessing all these years?!

 

[BigOscar]

Common sense prevails. Impossible to tell one way or the other really, so you have to go with the refs decision. (doesn't feel right disallowing a goal for a potential infringement that far before the goal anyway tbh)

My commentators don't seem to understand that balls are round so it's possible to see the grass but still have the ball on the line

 

[BoundedCascade]

In regards to the ball going out of touch does it have to be the same as a goal line decision and if any of the ball isn't over then its still in?

 

[brummie blue]

thought the ref had to view monitors, rather than try and hear a bloke in his ear piece.

 

[dronefromsector7G]

Yes let’s use video technology but not actually have cameras WHERE WE FUCKING NEED THEM

 

[aguero93:20]

Right decision.

Angle not clear enough to make it a clear and obvious mistake. If they want it comeoletelu correct then have hawk eye for all line decisions.

My commentators complaining there was grass between bottom of the ball and line. Someone should explain to them the shape of a fucking ball.

Yeah, looked in on one angle and out on the other, they didn't have the overhead so linesman original call stands. Didn't really need to take 3 minutes though, gives the impression (possibly accurate) that they're looking for a reason to disallow the goal rather than a clear and obvious error.

 

[mccity]

VAR can confirm that it was in fact Kane who scored the goal, he swears by it.

 

[Vienna_70]

Not a clear and obvious error, I suppose.

 

[kaz7]

Sounds like they tried to disallow it
Ramos you tit lol