citytilidie85 said:
For me the points and pot system is just another way of UEFA trying to keep the status quo of the "elite" teams in Europe. As others have said, how can a team who finish third or fourth be placed higher than a team who wins their league? For me, the winners of the top 8 countries based on FIFA rankings should go into separate groups and the rest are drawn out at random, none of this pot 2, 3, 4 rubbish. Cant make my mind up on the teams from the same league cant play each other though. Over the last 10 years, most seasons I could have picked 80% of the teams who would make it through to the KO rounds, there are always surprises but generally you can predict the teams once the groups have been drawn. If Platini really wants FFP then it has to be fair across the whole board, the way to earn more money is to get into the later rounds, so make it fairer for teams to make the later rounds. If you end with 4 top teams against each other in the groups, then we will really find out who the best are, not playing some non-descript Bulgarian team made up of part-timers!
So you want to increase the probability for weaker teams to get lucky? Right now, if a pot 4 team makes it to the k.o.-stage, they proved they are good enough. In your case it's even more about luck. Now finishing second is almost always possible for teams out of pot 3 or 4, they have to beat a good team but not a great one to finish second. With your idea, almost every time there will be at least one group with 2 out of the top8 teams in europe. In these groups the weaker teams have absolutely no chance to go through while in other groups one of the small teams will aways go through. It's not perfect now, but what you're suggesting sounds like a lottery.
In your opinion, should the competition at least try to have the 8 best teams in the quarter finals? Or should it all be about the draw, making it possible to get to the final without ever facing a top8 team?
Your idea, that there shouldn't be a team coefficient to determine who's in pot 1,2,3 or 4, doesn't sound fair to me either. Let's say two teams play in europe for 4 years without winning the league. Team 1 never tried to compete, played reserve players all the time and never made it out of the group stages. The other team tried everything to win, playing the best players available, reaching the quarter and semi finals several times. In the 5th year Team 1 wins the league, one point ahead of Team 2. Now you think it's fair that Team 1 should be in Pot 1 even though they didn't show any respect for the european competition, at all? While all the games Team 2 won in Europe in the last 4 years shouldn't count, because they finished one point behind in the league?
It shouldn't be easy for new teams to get to the top. It wasn't easy for any team to get there, and it sure as hell isn't easy to stay at the top. Teams like Dortmund or Juventus who won the CL in the last 20 years dropped out and have to fight their way back. Bayern, Real and Milan fell out of pot 1 a few years back. Bayern went down to 18th in UEFA's team coefficient for example. Happens, others have the chance to establish themselves at the top. Bayern turned it around, finishing ahead of pot 1 teams in their CL groups and now they're back in Pot 1.
The system works, playing great in europe is rewarded, as it should be. The european competitions are great when teams play their best football in them. Teams disrespecting the competition (for example playing the second team in europe instead of trying to win with the best players) shouldn't have an advantage.