You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Champs League Draw
- Thread starter Daz_Blue
- Start date
buckshot
Well-Known Member
MCFC1993 said:tenententen said:It seems like playing in the Europa League gives more benefits as the coefficient reward is very good.
Nevertheless, other clubs will be nervous about playing one another. Roma might actually beat Bayern as well.
Thats when shit really will hit the fan, if us and Roma some how get through, then I expect a few Bayern officials to cause on uproar over the seedings etc... That's what I think it'll take for UEFA to act.
Excellent points
chesterguy
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 16 Oct 2007
- Messages
- 1,507
Champions League draw is a tedious and bent travesty that rewards the mediocre old-guard instead of domestic champions
By Martin Samuel - Sport
So here comes another one, just like the other one. The best team in England have the toughest Champions League draw. Again.
Manchester City will play Bayern Munich. Again. And CSKA Moscow. Again. Meanwhile, Arsenal meet Borussia Dortmund and Chelsea face Schalke 04. Again, again.
Each tie listed here is a repeat of last year’s pairings. It is so tame, so predictable. When will UEFA sort out the abomination that is their seeding system?
For a body so keen on fairness, the concept goes out of the window whenever the dead hand of UEFA reaches for its little balls in bowls.
The elite are protected so that Arsenal, who last won the title in 2004 and needed to pre-qualify this year, are shielded from the toughest opposition, while Manchester City, reigning champions with two title wins in three years, must again climb a mountain to reach the later stages.
It is warped. Bent in favour of the established elite so that there were more champions in pots B and D than in marquee pot A. This produces ferociously unfair match-ups.
Every team in Group A, for instance, are national champions — Atletico Madrid, Juventus, Olympiacos and Malmo — while Arsenal and Chelsea have to contend with a single league winner apiece, Anderlecht of Belgium for Arsene Wenger, Maribor of Slovenia for Chelsea.
Manchester City face Bayern Munich and CSKA Moscow, champions of Germany and Russia.
The whole process reeks of protectionism. Michel Platini, UEFA president, says he will address this at the next Champions League summit, but then bleats that he needs the permission of the clubs to change. He means the old, rich ones of course — it is not as if the others matter.
The co-efficient rankings that are used to insure the most powerful against their mediocrity could equally be used to implement a fairer competition. UEFA’s points system also reveals the identity of the strongest leagues in club competition — currently Spain, England, Germany, Portugal, Italy, Russia and France.
So the champions of those countries should be the seven top seeds, plus the Champions League holders. This would create a more egalitarian pot A, comprising Atletico Madrid, Manchester City, Bayern Munich, Benfica, Juventus, CSKA Moscow, Paris Saint Germain and Real Madrid. Fairer already.
Pot B would then be taken from the champions of the next eight leagues off the rank, if they had qualified – meaning Ukraine (Shakhtar Donetsk), Holland (Ajax), Belgium (Anderlecht), Switzerland (Basle) and Greece (Olympiacos), plus the second-placed teams from Spain (Barcelona), England (Liverpool) and Germany (Borussia Dortmund).
Using this system, pot C would be Malmo, BATE Borisov, Apoel Nicosia, Sporting Lisbon, Roma, Zenit St Petersburg, Monaco and Chelsea, and pot D the remainder, including Arsenal and Bayer Leverkusen, who cannot surely expect to come fourth and be seeded any higher. That way there would be genuine movement in the rankings, and fresh match-ups each year.
And, yes, under that system Manchester City could end up with Olympiacos, Apoel Nicosia and Ludogorets Razgrad and Arsenal with Real Madrid, Ajax and Roma — but as one team won its league and the other came fourth, why should it be any other way? This is the Champions League. That title should mean something.
Instead, domestic success counts for nothing and the same teams meet year after year, often with the same results.
This is the third time in four seasons that Manchester City will have faced Bayern Munich at the group stage, and the same applies to Arsenal and Borussia Dortmund. How is that healthy, or compelling?
When the Champions League began it felt exotic and new, now the group stage only gets interesting if one of the big boys messes up.
It is a routine revenue-generating process, there to fill TV primetime and only undertaken as a means to an end.
We know the serious stuff begins after Christmas, once a free draw heralds the arrival of the knock-out stage.
Deep down, that is what football’s establishment fears, of course: not being good enough, not being up to the test.
It is to UEFA’s shame that they then indulge this naked protectionism. Either Platini is complacent, or foolish; probably both.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...instead-domestic-champions.html#ixzz3Bl0Q9yet
k
By Martin Samuel - Sport
So here comes another one, just like the other one. The best team in England have the toughest Champions League draw. Again.
Manchester City will play Bayern Munich. Again. And CSKA Moscow. Again. Meanwhile, Arsenal meet Borussia Dortmund and Chelsea face Schalke 04. Again, again.
Each tie listed here is a repeat of last year’s pairings. It is so tame, so predictable. When will UEFA sort out the abomination that is their seeding system?
For a body so keen on fairness, the concept goes out of the window whenever the dead hand of UEFA reaches for its little balls in bowls.
The elite are protected so that Arsenal, who last won the title in 2004 and needed to pre-qualify this year, are shielded from the toughest opposition, while Manchester City, reigning champions with two title wins in three years, must again climb a mountain to reach the later stages.
It is warped. Bent in favour of the established elite so that there were more champions in pots B and D than in marquee pot A. This produces ferociously unfair match-ups.
Every team in Group A, for instance, are national champions — Atletico Madrid, Juventus, Olympiacos and Malmo — while Arsenal and Chelsea have to contend with a single league winner apiece, Anderlecht of Belgium for Arsene Wenger, Maribor of Slovenia for Chelsea.
Manchester City face Bayern Munich and CSKA Moscow, champions of Germany and Russia.
The whole process reeks of protectionism. Michel Platini, UEFA president, says he will address this at the next Champions League summit, but then bleats that he needs the permission of the clubs to change. He means the old, rich ones of course — it is not as if the others matter.
The co-efficient rankings that are used to insure the most powerful against their mediocrity could equally be used to implement a fairer competition. UEFA’s points system also reveals the identity of the strongest leagues in club competition — currently Spain, England, Germany, Portugal, Italy, Russia and France.
So the champions of those countries should be the seven top seeds, plus the Champions League holders. This would create a more egalitarian pot A, comprising Atletico Madrid, Manchester City, Bayern Munich, Benfica, Juventus, CSKA Moscow, Paris Saint Germain and Real Madrid. Fairer already.
Pot B would then be taken from the champions of the next eight leagues off the rank, if they had qualified – meaning Ukraine (Shakhtar Donetsk), Holland (Ajax), Belgium (Anderlecht), Switzerland (Basle) and Greece (Olympiacos), plus the second-placed teams from Spain (Barcelona), England (Liverpool) and Germany (Borussia Dortmund).
Using this system, pot C would be Malmo, BATE Borisov, Apoel Nicosia, Sporting Lisbon, Roma, Zenit St Petersburg, Monaco and Chelsea, and pot D the remainder, including Arsenal and Bayer Leverkusen, who cannot surely expect to come fourth and be seeded any higher. That way there would be genuine movement in the rankings, and fresh match-ups each year.
And, yes, under that system Manchester City could end up with Olympiacos, Apoel Nicosia and Ludogorets Razgrad and Arsenal with Real Madrid, Ajax and Roma — but as one team won its league and the other came fourth, why should it be any other way? This is the Champions League. That title should mean something.
Instead, domestic success counts for nothing and the same teams meet year after year, often with the same results.
This is the third time in four seasons that Manchester City will have faced Bayern Munich at the group stage, and the same applies to Arsenal and Borussia Dortmund. How is that healthy, or compelling?
When the Champions League began it felt exotic and new, now the group stage only gets interesting if one of the big boys messes up.
It is a routine revenue-generating process, there to fill TV primetime and only undertaken as a means to an end.
We know the serious stuff begins after Christmas, once a free draw heralds the arrival of the knock-out stage.
Deep down, that is what football’s establishment fears, of course: not being good enough, not being up to the test.
It is to UEFA’s shame that they then indulge this naked protectionism. Either Platini is complacent, or foolish; probably both.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...instead-domestic-champions.html#ixzz3Bl0Q9yet
k
Prestwich_Blue
Well-Known Member
Im claiming copyright on Samuel's article as I wrote pretty much the same thing in KOTK ladt year (or might have been on here). My system was ever so slightly different in that the countries with 4 teams (which are the strongest leagues) saw their teams in Pots 1-4, the countries with 3 teams saw their teams in Pots 1-3 etc until Pot 1 had the champions from effectively the 8 strongest leagues. So Pot 1 would be the champions of Spain, Germany, England, Italy, France, Portugal, Russia & Ukraine on the current UEFA standings.
goater1978
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 May 2011
- Messages
- 643
I'm not that bothered about the draw as I don't think we are good enough to win the champions league yet. If we don't get out of the group stages that pretty much guarantees us winning the premier league. Plus I would not be that bothered if we finished 3rd in the group as I think we would have a good chance of winning the Europa league. Obviously it's nowhere near as prestigious as the champions league but a European trophy would be good!
St Helens Blue (Exiled)
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 May 2011
- Messages
- 13,777
im sure Martin Samuel is a closet blue..He must read this forum. Top unbias journo with no axe to grind.
FantasyIreland
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Oct 2008
- Messages
- 64,697
St Helens Blue (Exiled) said:im sure Martin Samuel is a closet blue..He must read this forum. Top unbias journo with no axe to grind.
He may well have a soft spot......however,i just see him as a man of integrity who can see right through the transparent,bent twats.
TBH Football would be the real winner if they just abandoned the constraints apart from keeping teams from the same country apart in the group stages and the Television rights, I.e. The Tuesday and Wednesday spilt for teams from the same country.
After this let it be an open draw and the best teams will eventually prevail with a few Nottingham Forrest's, Hamburgs and Malmos thrown in for good measure.
Will return the game to the fans and remove the sterilisation that the co-efficient shave delivered over the years.
After this let it be an open draw and the best teams will eventually prevail with a few Nottingham Forrest's, Hamburgs and Malmos thrown in for good measure.
Will return the game to the fans and remove the sterilisation that the co-efficient shave delivered over the years.