Ched Evans - serious injury

Dubai Blue said:
The country I live in being one of them. I think it sets a terrible precedent though, as it inevitably results in the rich avoiding justice at the expense of the poor. But that's a discussion for another day!
Click to expand...
Don't disagree at all, 3 young Aussie lads just did the same in Croatia where I was surprised this was allowed
 
Presumably now his conviction has been quashed, no one should complain if he attempts to resurrect his football career. He is now in the same position as Adam Johnson was pre-trial and Johnson continued to play until his guilt was established.
 
The women who cry rape who haven't been need to go to jail.

The footballers should get the electric chair if they have to rape a girl for a bit of sex action. With their money and fame, they should have it on tap even if it is from a prostitute..
 
west didsblue said:
Presumably now his conviction has been quashed, no one should complain if he attempts to resurrect his football career. He is now in the same position as Adam Johnson was pre-trial and Johnson continued to play until his guilt was established.
Click to expand...

It would be a bold decision for anyone to employ him. He's still awaiting another trial that could lead to a guilty conviction.

All this decision has done is assess the lawfulness of his original conviction. It has been found that the jury/judge were wrong to find him guilty from the evidence presented and didn't make their decision in a lawful manner - especially considering new evidence. The retrial will have the aim of making the correct and lawful decision, but that may reach the same conclusion.

I don't know much about the new evidence but as I said earlier, I was surprised he was found guilty in the first place considering Clayton wasn't. Did he act like a bit of a twat? 100% yes. Does that justify a conviction for rape? 100% no!

He said in his questioning by the Police he could have had any girl he wanted as a pro footballer so why would he rape anyone? That's been twisted by the prosecution to show him as arrogant etc. The woman was revealed to be lying about being on drugs on the night in question. There's not enough evidence to convict him in my opinion. There wasn't at the original trial and his situation has clearly improved in terms of his defence evidence now.
 
adam johnson's sister is tasty as feck she could pass as a WAG herself:

SUNSPEC_msemail_px_2813413a.jpg


Gotta love a good ol' selfie stick ! ;) she needs more than that though..
 
supercity88 said:
It would be a bold decision for anyone to employ him. He's still awaiting another trial that could lead to a guilty conviction.

All this decision has done is assess the lawfulness of his original conviction. It has been found that the jury/judge were wrong to find him guilty from the evidence presented and didn't make their decision in a lawful manner - especially considering new evidence. The retrial will have the aim of making the correct and lawful decision, but that may reach the same conclusion.

I don't know much about the new evidence but as I said earlier, I was surprised he was found guilty in the first place considering Clayton wasn't. Did he act like a bit of a twat? 100% yes. Does that justify a conviction for rape? 100% no!

He said in his questioning by the Police he could have had any girl he wanted as a pro footballer so why would he rape anyone? That's been twisted by the prosecution to show him as arrogant etc. The woman was revealed to be lying about being on drugs on the night in question. There's not enough evidence to convict him in my opinion. There wasn't at the original trial and his situation has clearly improved in terms of his defence evidence now.
Click to expand...
As his conviction was quashed, under he law he is currently regarding as innocent until proven guilty. I'm sure there are numerous examples of footballers who continue to play in the run up to their trial and I don't see why he should be any different. If clubs employed people like Marlon King and Lee Hughes who had actually been convicted it would be hypocritical for Evans to not be given the opportunity to resurrect his career in the run up to his trial which could be many months or even years away.
 
west didsblue said:
As his conviction was quashed, under he law he is currently regarding as innocent until proven guilty. I'm sure there are numerous examples of footballers who continue to play in the run up to their trial and I don't see why he should be any different. If clubs employed people like Marlon King and Lee Hughes who had actually been convicted it would be hypocritical for Evans to not be given the opportunity to resurrect his career in the run up to his trial which could be many months or even years away.
Click to expand...
Absolutely.
 
west didsblue said:
As his conviction was quashed, under he law he is currently regarding as innocent until proven guilty. I'm sure there are numerous examples of footballers who continue to play in the run up to their trial and I don't see why he should be any different. If clubs employed people like Marlon King and Lee Hughes who had actually been convicted it would be hypocritical for Evans to not be given the opportunity to resurrect his career in the run up to his trial which could be many months or even years away.
Click to expand...

But you would still get the do gooders of mumsnet and the 'look at me' types like Jessica Ennis-Hill causing a shit storm for the lad.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.