Ched Evans - serious injury

Antonio Luna and Eibar team-mate Sergi Enrich have just had a video released of them roasting some bird. Nowt like solid video evidence. Think on, Ched.
 
Prestwich_Blue said:
Just had a quick look and the questions are whether this was something like normal behaviour for Evans & Macdonald. Sadly the answer was yes, it was something they'd done previously.
Click to expand...

Cheers PB, I did know that part already, just Petrusha confused me as he seemed to indicate it related to the girl here, thought Evans may have been trying to muddy the waters a little.
 
Dirty Harry said:
Cheers PB, I did know that part already, just Petrusha confused me as he seemed to indicate it related to the girl here, thought Evans may have been trying to muddy the waters a little.
Click to expand...

Sorry, I didn't see your first post. Note that you posted on Friday morning, 24 hours after my post on Thursday morning.

If you go back on that Twitter feed to last Wednesday, the second day of the current retrial and the most recent evidence before I posted my comments, there's a load of stuff about the girl. In particular, it focused on sexual encounters she was having around the time of the incident with Evans and McDonald. That wasn't put in evidence at the first trial and is at least some of the new evidence based on which Evans was granted a retrial.

The fact that Evans and McDonald had a threesome with another girl a couple of years previously featured in the first trial because they spoke about it in their police interviews. In this trial, the police transcripts were read out last Thursday and the proclivities of Ched and Clayton have been discussed in Ched's evidence today. (No evidence was given on Friday, as there was an adjournment).
 
Today's events in court covered below and I'm guessing this is the new evidence that the appeal court referred to and it squares with what petrusha said about the defence concentrating on pattern of behaviour - a witness that wasn't present at the original trial has subsequently come forward to say he had sex with the complainant not long after the alleged offence and claims she used the same phrase Evans said she used when having sex. The witness - who has known the complainant for several years - also claims she woke up one morning with him after they had sex the night before and said she couldn't remember what happened. Prosecution allege he's lying in order to get the £50,000 reward which he denies.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/ched-evans-rape-trial-live-9020950
 
M18CTID said:
Today's events in court covered below and I'm guessing this is the new evidence that the appeal court referred to and it squares with what petrusha said about the defence concentrating on pattern of behaviour - a witness that wasn't present at the original trial has subsequently come forward to say he had sex with the complainant not long after the alleged offence and claims she used the same phrase Evans said she used when having sex. The witness - who has known the complainant for several years - also claims she woke up one morning with him after they had sex the night before and said she couldn't remember what happened. Prosecution allege he's lying in order to get the £50,000 reward which he denies.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/ched-evans-rape-trial-live-9020950
Click to expand...
Dangle 50 grand in front of anyone and they will lie,trying to trash the victim as she is in this case is a low thing to do and why so few women who are assulted come fowards
 
karen7 said:
Dangle 50 grand in front of anyone and they will lie,trying to trash the victim as she is in this case is a low thing to do and why so few women who are assulted come fowards
Click to expand...

Is there any evidence that he's lying? He could be of course but no-one knows for sure. He originally came forward just after the original trial and if I'm not mistaken there was no website - and reward - set up at that point.
 
M18CTID said:
Is there any evidence that he's lying? He could be of course but no-one knows for sure. He originally came forward just after the original trial and if I'm not mistaken there was no website - and reward - set up at that point.
Click to expand...
The jury will decide if he is lying,seems fishy to me but we'll see
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.