prestonibbo_mcfc said:
You keep telling yourself that, but it ain't true. Half a youth team. Lol. We played Rekik,Rusnak,Boyata,Huws and Razak at some point,all who were
never near the first team.
Not that it really matters but I have to disagree, in the first 3-4 the lineups were:
Chelsea (4-1-4-1): Cech; Azpilicueta, Ivanovic, Cahill, Christensen; Mikel; Mata, Benayoun, Loftus-Cheek, Cole; Ba
Manchester City (4-2-3-1): Hart; Zabaleta, Kompany, Rekik, Clichy; Garcia, Y Toure; Rusnak, Tevez, Silva; Aguero
And in NY it was:
Manchester City: Hart; Kompany (C), Zabaleta, Kolarov, Boyata; Nasri, Barry, Silva, Toure; Aguero, Tevez
Chelsea: Hilario; Luiz, Azpilicueta, Christensen, Ake; Ramires, Oscar, Obi Mikel, Loftus-Cheek; Ba, Torres (C)
You played your usual system with no more than a couple of youth players at a time. We played 442 without Mata/Hazard/Oscar together once. Torres captained our second game for goodness sake.
Chris in London said:
How do you think Mourinho will approach it Castiel? A draw isn't a bad result for either side, if City lose away at Chelsea it isn't the end of the world, but a City win would be a big blow for Chelsea. Do you think Mourinho will be cautious as at old Trafford? Or will he go for the win and risk the defeat?
I think we played United too early and Mourinho severely overestimated them. I actually think he regrets it. He went there and played like it was a Ferguson team. A draw would be good for you, because we won't win the return leg. I don't expect him to play for a draw but I think he'd rather make City attack us than overcommit ourselves. If we're level in the last 10/15 minutes I can see him risking the points to win it at home. He's done that before against weaker teams and it has worked so far, he uses some ridiculous 3-2-3-2 which seems to throw games into end to end chaos but it has worked so far with the exception of Everton away.