Chelsea Thread 2013/14

Status
Not open for further replies.
BigOscar said:
manimanc said:
to any Chelsea fans on here,i`ve got 606 on at the minute and some Chelsea fans are saying about the Chelsea announcer saying something to the stoke fans?
anybody shed some light?
Chelsea's announcer: "Welcome to all the Stoke fans. All 700 of you. Just over 10% of your allocation."

Pretty classless, but probably about what you'd expect from Chelsea

It's a cheap shot from a tacky club who tolerate racist players and those with shoplifting wives and drug-dealing dads, so as you say about par for the course.
How many fans did Chelsea take when they were in the old second division and shit?
Roman and his roubles pitch up and hey presto the Bridge is full of Essex tourists again.
That said, I fucking detest Maureen, but he's done a cracking bit of business here in conning the rags out of a club record for a good but not great player to cover a position they don't need covering anyway.
 
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
BigOscar said:
manimanc said:
to any Chelsea fans on here,i`ve got 606 on at the minute and some Chelsea fans are saying about the Chelsea announcer saying something to the stoke fans?
anybody shed some light?
Chelsea's announcer: "Welcome to all the Stoke fans. All 700 of you. Just over 10% of your allocation."

Pretty classless, but probably about what you'd expect from Chelsea

It's a cheap shot from a tacky club who tolerate racist players and those with shoplifting wives and drug-dealing dads, so as you say about par for the course.
How many fans did Chelsea take when they were in the old second division and shit?
Roman and his roubles pitch up and hey presto the Bridge is full of Essex tourists again.
That said, I fucking detest Maureen, but he's done a cracking bit of business here in conning the rags out of a club record for a good but not great player to cover a position they don't need covering anyway.

Haha brilliant, you have no clue if you're asking that question.
 
zola said:
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
BigOscar said:
Chelsea's announcer: "Welcome to all the Stoke fans. All 700 of you. Just over 10% of your allocation."

Pretty classless, but probably about what you'd expect from Chelsea

It's a cheap shot from a tacky club who tolerate racist players and those with shoplifting wives and drug-dealing dads, so as you say about par for the course.
How many fans did Chelsea take when they were in the old second division and shit?
Roman and his roubles pitch up and hey presto the Bridge is full of Essex tourists again.
That said, I fucking detest Maureen, but he's done a cracking bit of business here in conning the rags out of a club record for a good but not great player to cover a position they don't need covering anyway.

Haha brilliant, you have no clue if you're asking that question.

So answer the question !
 
zola said:
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
BigOscar said:
Chelsea's announcer: "Welcome to all the Stoke fans. All 700 of you. Just over 10% of your allocation."

Pretty classless, but probably about what you'd expect from Chelsea

It's a cheap shot from a tacky club who tolerate racist players and those with shoplifting wives and drug-dealing dads, so as you say about par for the course.
How many fans did Chelsea take when they were in the old second division and shit?
Roman and his roubles pitch up and hey presto the Bridge is full of Essex tourists again.
That said, I fucking detest Maureen, but he's done a cracking bit of business here in conning the rags out of a club record for a good but not great player to cover a position they don't need covering anyway.

Haha brilliant, you have no clue if you're asking that question.
True, I imagine they had national front members from all around the country helping out the away crowds. Averaged an impressive 12,500 a game in 1983 when they were in the 2nd division though, so I guess even racists have a fairweather attitude to Chelsea
 
dave_blue12 said:
zola said:
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
It's a cheap shot from a tacky club who tolerate racist players and those with shoplifting wives and drug-dealing dads, so as you say about par for the course.
How many fans did Chelsea take when they were in the old second division and shit?
Roman and his roubles pitch up and hey presto the Bridge is full of Essex tourists again.
That said, I fucking detest Maureen, but he's done a cracking bit of business here in conning the rags out of a club record for a good but not great player to cover a position they don't need covering anyway.

Haha brilliant, you have no clue if you're asking that question.

So answer the question !

Chelsea would regularly take 3-5000 everywhere, took 10,000 to Maine Road on at least 2 occasions which I'm sure some of your older fans would confirm. 15,000 to Sunderland for a midweek league cup game. Yes our home gates were poor as Football was in depression and warring terraces was the norm but away Chelsea "when they were shit" were only surpassed by United and Liverpool in numbers travelling.
 
zola said:
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
BigOscar said:
Chelsea's announcer: "Welcome to all the Stoke fans. All 700 of you. Just over 10% of your allocation."

Pretty classless, but probably about what you'd expect from Chelsea

It's a cheap shot from a tacky club who tolerate racist players and those with shoplifting wives and drug-dealing dads, so as you say about par for the course.
How many fans did Chelsea take when they were in the old second division and shit?
Roman and his roubles pitch up and hey presto the Bridge is full of Essex tourists again.
That said, I fucking detest Maureen, but he's done a cracking bit of business here in conning the rags out of a club record for a good but not great player to cover a position they don't need covering anyway.

Haha brilliant, you have no clue if you're asking that question.

Then enlighten us, chavboy.
Because I can remember playing you when we were both shit and your away support would have struggled to fill a phone box.
 
dave_blue12 said:
zola said:
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
It's a cheap shot from a tacky club who tolerate racist players and those with shoplifting wives and drug-dealing dads, so as you say about par for the course.
How many fans did Chelsea take when they were in the old second division and shit?
Roman and his roubles pitch up and hey presto the Bridge is full of Essex tourists again.
That said, I fucking detest Maureen, but he's done a cracking bit of business here in conning the rags out of a club record for a good but not great player to cover a position they don't need covering anyway.

Haha brilliant, you have no clue if you're asking that question.

So answer the question !
average attendance of 12,672 in 1983 says google.
 
BigOscar said:
zola said:
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
It's a cheap shot from a tacky club who tolerate racist players and those with shoplifting wives and drug-dealing dads, so as you say about par for the course.
How many fans did Chelsea take when they were in the old second division and shit?
Roman and his roubles pitch up and hey presto the Bridge is full of Essex tourists again.
That said, I fucking detest Maureen, but he's done a cracking bit of business here in conning the rags out of a club record for a good but not great player to cover a position they don't need covering anyway.

Haha brilliant, you have no clue if you're asking that question.
True, I imagine they had national front members from all around the country helping out the away crowds. Averaged an impressive 12,500 a game in 1983 when they were in the 2nd division though, so I guess even racists have a fairweather attitude to Chelsea
I'm surprised people stoop this low for tribalism.
 
zola said:
dave_blue12 said:
zola said:
Haha brilliant, you have no clue if you're asking that question.

So answer the question !

Chelsea would regularly take 3-5000 everywhere, took 10,000 to Maine Road on at least 2 occasions which I'm sure some of your older fans would confirm. 15,000 to Sunderland for a midweek league cup game. Yes our home gates were poor as Football was in depression and warring terraces was the norm but away Chelsea "when they were shit" were only surpassed by United and Liverpool in numbers travelling.

Utter fucking rubbish.
I have held a season ticket since 1966, and you never brought anything like 10,000 fans to Maine Road.
You barely had that many for home games.
Check out our gates when 'football was in depression' - you may see how real fans stuck by their club when times were hard, whilst you chavs stayed at home and watched on MOTD.
 
Castiel said:
BigOscar said:
zola said:
Haha brilliant, you have no clue if you're asking that question.
True, I imagine they had national front members from all around the country helping out the away crowds. Averaged an impressive 12,500 a game in 1983 when they were in the 2nd division though, so I guess even racists have a fairweather attitude to Chelsea
I'm surprised people stoop this low for tribalism.
That's not tribalism. Chelsea in the 70's and 80's were a racist club. That's not an opinion, that's a fact.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.