Worst Case Ontario
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 Feb 2011
- Messages
- 2,238
- Location
- Me a aim fi the sky like plane...
- Team supported
- them a pray fi me fall like rain!!!
haha the irony is lost on you :Dbgblue said:Fucking rent boy bastards
haha the irony is lost on you :Dbgblue said:Fucking rent boy bastards
cookster said:Seems they are beating us on all fronts at the moment:
1st team win the Prem
u18's win the FA Cup
Ladies beat us in the Semi
Castiel said:In the second half of the season perhaps. People have short memories. In the first half we were hands down the most expansive side on display. The problem we were having was even though we scored a lot, we were conceding too many. We had defensive vulnerabilities even the relegation candidates could expose. People here were saying as much if you care to check the gameweek threads from the time. It wasn't a problem until we were completely exposed by Spurs, then lost to Bradford in the cup. Around this period is when City pulled back our lead to only a few points. At that juncture Mourinho reigned the attacking play in so we could play with a lower block and kill games once ahead. Our lead was consequently rebuilt and we cruised home from there, though much more subdued. This coincided with player burnout since we don't rotate much, and we started to lose Costa for long stretches. Had we stuck to our guns these weaknesses could have been continuously exposed and we may not be champions now.lasereyes said:For what it's worth, I thought Hazard's was a penalty yesterday. That aside, there is no doubt Chelsea are the most mindnumbingly boring team eve to win the PL - comparing badly even with Mourinho's previous teams. And i dont see them changing much. If we can fill our obvious holes (Toure replacement, Fernando upgrade, quality winger, Clichy/Kolarov upgrade), no reason we shouldn't be right alongside if not ahead of them next year.
What I suspect he'll be looking to do this summer is to address the problems we had in defence when we tried playing a more expansive game. I think he wants to press high, win the ball in advanced positions and kill the opposition with speedy counters as we were doing before Christmas (this is how he had Madrid playing); but our defence proved they couldn't cope with it adequately. He tried to do this last season as well, and it works for a while until these issues are found out - but last season we had striker problems to compound it. Terry, as formidable as he's been, is probably a big part of the problem because he's now very slow. So he'll be looking to get the right kind of defenders in first of all. The second issue is the fact that he seems unhappy with his squad players, and too little rotation leads to burnout.
I think you make some good points, but our attack was dulled not only because of the reversion in style after WHL, but also because Fabregas had his usual winter dip in form and we started losing Costa (and Remy) for long periods. All of this contributed. We're just so clinical that we don't need many chances to score, and we're the gold standard at killing a game once ahead. The central defence needs some tweaking if we're to keep up our early season style with confidence that the back line can plug the gaps. I suspect Varane will be a top target for us this summer. It's good to know that we're adept at both very aggressive and very defensive systems, we only need some faster more technical defenders to really make it reliable.GHoddle said:I kind of see it differently, though I agree you can't play a high line with Terry. But you also aren't that swashbuckling on the counterattack like other teams can be that play a lower block. I wonder why that is given the talent of players in the Chelsea squad? My thought is that primarily the defense isn't that composed on the ball, so when the ball is won back deep in your half your defenders often elect to play the safe option rather than try to find someone like Fabregas. So the opportunity to counterattack sometimes doesn't present itself because the defenders don't initiate them with accurate passes into midfield.
Anyway that's just my thought on it, I could be talking a load of shit so idk.
Castiel said:I think you make some good points, but our attack was dulled not only because of the reversion in style after WHL, but also because Fabregas had his usual winter dip in form and we started losing Costa (and Remy) for long periods. All of this contributed. We're just so clinical that we don't need many chances to score, and we're the gold standard at killing a game once ahead. The central defence needs some tweaking if we're to keep up our early season style with confidence that the back line can plug the gaps. I suspect Varane will be a top target for us this summer. It's good to know that we're adept at both very aggressive and very defensive systems, we only need some faster more technical defenders to really make it reliable.GHoddle said:I kind of see it differently, though I agree you can't play a high line with Terry. But you also aren't that swashbuckling on the counterattack like other teams can be that play a lower block. I wonder why that is given the talent of players in the Chelsea squad? My thought is that primarily the defense isn't that composed on the ball, so when the ball is won back deep in your half your defenders often elect to play the safe option rather than try to find someone like Fabregas. So the opportunity to counterattack sometimes doesn't present itself because the defenders don't initiate them with accurate passes into midfield.
Anyway that's just my thought on it, I could be talking a load of shit so idk.
Jose perhaps went too conservative when things started going wrong. He may have panicked when we only really needed to haul it in against teams with the tools to properly expose us as you did. Then again the writing was on the wall in the 3-6 against Everton. Perhaps the most thrilling game I saw this season, but that Everton side shouldn't have been able to get through us so easily.