Chelsea Thread - 2023/24

[jimharri]

But so what? Are you suggesting the coverage should end immediately after the final whistle? They’re gonna have to talk about the game and mention the good (and bad) things they saw. I watched the coverage. It was just normal post game chat. I don’t understand the gripe at all.

I never said any such thing. If you can show me where I did, please do. Don't twist what I said, okay? You said people weren't going overboard about the result/performance, I said that Sky were very praising post game. I added context to it by pointing out the opposition.

 

[mexico1970]

I never said any such thing. If you can show me where I did, please do. Don't twist what I said, okay? You said people weren't going overboard about the result/performance, I said that Sky were very praising post game. I added context to it by pointing out the opposition.

Let's not forget that Sterling is now the worlds best prospect after having only 2 decent games against poorer opposition.

Some on here are already asking to re-sign him :O

 

[jimharri]

Let's not forget that Sterling is now the worlds best prospect after having only 2 decent games against poorer opposition.

Some on here are already asking to re-sign him :O

He did play well last night, to be fair to him. I think the move was probably in the best interests of both Raheem and City; he seemed to have lost his way with us, and needed a fresh challenge. Re last season; well, he wasn't the only Chelsea player who underperformed. I hope he does well for them in all but two games.

 

[Vialli98]

I never said any such thing. If you can show me where I did, please do. Don't twist what I said, okay? You said people weren't going overboard about the result/performance, I said that Sky were very praising post game. I added context to it by pointing out the opposition.

I’m not saying you said that. I asked if that is what you were suggesting, meaning you didn’t say it. I posed you a question based on your responses to me. We’re going round in circles though. I watched the Skysports coverage and I didn’t feel it was in any shape over the top praise. But fair enough if you did.

 

[jimharri]

I’m not saying you said that. I asked if that is what you were suggesting, meaning you didn’t say it. I posed you a question based on your responses to me. We’re going round in circles though. I watched the Skysports coverage and I didn’t feel it was in any shape over the top praise. But fair enough if you did.

I never said "over the top", I said they were very praising of your side. I'm not going to go on (and on, and on...) about it, as I don't want to derail the thread.

 

[mexico1970]

He did play well last night, to be fair to him. I think the move was probably in the best interests of both Raheem and City; he seemed to have lost his way with us, and needed a fresh challenge. Re last season; well, he wasn't the only Chelsea player who underperformed. I hope he does well for them in all but two games.

Having played two decent games in a season and they are building him up though? Modern football sometimes has very low standards of excellence.

 

[bennyboy]

Let's not forget that Sterling is now the worlds best prospect after having only 2 decent games against poorer opposition.

Some on here are already asking to re-sign him :O

Nobody is asking for Sterling to come back.lol.

 

[mexico1970]

Nobody is asking for Sterling to come back.lol.

I have seen posts on here saying just that, not everyone on BM is playing with a full set of marbles ;)

 

[jimharri]

Having played two decent games in a season and they are building him up though? Modern football sometimes has very low standards of excellence.

That's the modern media for you. Witness the hype about Arsenal so far this season. No context about who they've played.

 

[jimharri]

I have seen posts on here saying just that, not everyone on BM is playing with a full set of marbles ;)