Chelsea V the rags..

cookster said:
cleavers said:
cookster said:
Get a clue
Try getting one yourself.

Good comeback, so you don't agree there was minimum contact on Young? So why wasn't he booked?

It's clear you are anti Torres which is clouding your judgement.
No mate I'm anti diving. Young is a proven diver, but on this occasion he WAS touched, and at full speed, 9/10 people would have gone down caught like that, I can understand arguments and different view points about the Torres decision, but not the Young one.

Torres knew what he was doing, Young didn't see Ivanovic.
 
cleavers said:
cookster said:
cleavers said:
Try getting one yourself.

Good comeback, so you don't agree there was minimum contact on Young? So why wasn't he booked?

It's clear you are anti Torres which is clouding your judgement.
No mate I'm anti diving. Young is a proven diver, but on this occasion he WAS touched, and at full speed, 9/10 people would have gone down caught like that, I can understand arguments and different view points about the Torres decision, but not the Young one.

Torres knew what he was doing, Young didn't see Ivanovic.
In my opinion, Young felt contact and made sure to go to ground... just like Torres.
 
AntiUnited said:
MSP said:
Quote from Daily Mail:
The Blues finished with nine men and were beaten by an offside winner as United made up for all the bad luck they perceived they had suffered at Stamford Bridge in one fell swoop to cut their opponents' lead at the top to one point.

What a bloody bastards that paper are


they seem to forget last years 2 gifted penalties :).

and 2 offside goals they scored to beat CHelsea 3.1 at OT last season.

Chelsea were blatantly robbed in their last 3 Unite games, we should feel happy with referring we got against them recently.
 
cleavers said:
cookster said:
cleavers said:
Try getting one yourself.

Good comeback, so you don't agree there was minimum contact on Young? So why wasn't he booked?

It's clear you are anti Torres which is clouding your judgement.
No mate I'm anti diving. Young is a proven diver, but on this occasion he WAS touched, and at full speed, 9/10 people would have gone down caught like that, I can understand arguments and different view points about the Torres decision, but not the Young one.

Torres knew what he was doing, Young didn't see Ivanovic.

I hate diving but really don't think the Torres incident is up for debate, Young neither.

I was just highlighting both were big decisions and went Manure's way. Young, Nani and Rooney will dive all season without a single booking!
 
cleavers said:
cookster said:
cleavers said:
Try getting one yourself.

Good comeback, so you don't agree there was minimum contact on Young? So why wasn't he booked?

It's clear you are anti Torres which is clouding your judgement.
No mate I'm anti diving. Young is a proven diver, but on this occasion he WAS touched, and at full speed, 9/10 people would have gone down caught like that, I can understand arguments and different view points about the Torres decision, but not the Young one.

Torres knew what he was doing, Young didn't see Ivanovic.

I'm not against anything until it's all same for everybody. They get penalties and their opponents sent off for dives.

Torres got sent off for something United player wouldn't be sent off in a 7 fucking million years.
 
cookster said:
cleavers said:
cookster said:
Good comeback, so you don't agree there was minimum contact on Young? So why wasn't he booked?

It's clear you are anti Torres which is clouding your judgement.
No mate I'm anti diving. Young is a proven diver, but on this occasion he WAS touched, and at full speed, 9/10 people would have gone down caught like that, I can understand arguments and different view points about the Torres decision, but not the Young one.

Torres knew what he was doing, Young didn't see Ivanovic.

I hate diving but really don't think the Torres incident is up for debate, Young neither.

I was just highlighting both were big decisions and went Manure's way. Young, Nani and Rooney will dive all season without a single booking!

Balotelli went down yesterday under a challenge in the box - no penalty so why wasn't he booked?
 
Re: Clattenburg is unbelievably rubbish

didnt he send bellers off at bolton a few seasons back for the same thing?

he's a bent as they come, always fear the worst when his officiating us
 
Re: Clattenburg is unbelievably rubbish

As stated previously on here he hasn't been allowed to referee a Scum game since the 6-1. In his mind he knew he had to redeem himself to the "power" which Slur Alex has over the FA so he could get the "big" games again.
It was on the cards, this performance from a referee who just loves to be centre stage.

The great referees are never noticed, and still are in some champions league games but sadly there are't any even good referees in our league now.
 
Just had an argument with my dad (rag), he said there should be no video technology as it'd slow the game down. Surprise surprise, we all know how much it'd hurt the rags as their constant dodgy decisions would be harder to justify and under instant scrutiny.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.