Stoned Rose
Well-Known Member
cookster said:
Erm you need to re-read the posts Cookster.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Chelski v Royals
- Thread starter mancity1
- Start date
Erm you need to re-read the posts Cookster.
MSP
Well-Known Member
though I didn't like him in bad Tevez times, TC knows more about football than most of you that jump to say crap about him as soon as he posts something.
Stoned Rose said:cookster said:Stoned Rose said:I know it's fashionable to knock everything TC says but to be fair he has a point there. The lad looks fuckin mustard.
Also seems fashionable to rate Hazard as the best Premier League player based on 2 performances against cannon fodder.
Erm you need to re-read the posts Cookster.
Erm I have - Hazard overload akin to premature ejaculation!
Stoned Rose said:cookster said:Tevez City said:If Hazard stays fit this season he may win the best player award.
Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha
Reading and Wigan and we have the best player in the prem!
I know it's fashionable to knock everything TC says but to be fair he has a point there. The lad looks fuckin mustard.
Its not fashionable SR its just that most people don't jump to conclusions.
He has pace , guile and knows how to draw a foul in the box and given the reports about him in France he is obviously a plus for Chelski and at 32m they would hope he is but lets not have a wank fest over the bloke after two games against mediocre opposition and on the basis of these performances think Chelski are the real deal again , its way too early for that.
Stoned Rose
Well-Known Member
mancity1 said:Stoned Rose said:FFS you lot!!! if you couldn't see that that was a team with extremely good attacking strength and midfield creativity you really and I mean really dont understand football.
Yes they've played 2 average sides so far but last year when we slapped Swansea and Bolton I'm sure most reasonable people could 'see' we had a bloody good team and would be there or thereabouts.
You lads seriously disagree that they'll be genuine contenders for the league??
If they are top or near top come February/March then yes I will agree with you.
That's good of you mate. You seriously need to wait until the season is nearly over to know if a team is a contender or not?
Reading and Wigan will be candidates for the drop this season.
Seems strange that you can confidenty spot relegation fodder after 2 games, but not a good team.
You probably think because a lady you fancy smiles at you twice in succession your a shoe in to rattle her cage later that night.
Ladies dont bother smiling at me mate they know I'm simply unattainable.
It rarely works out that way Stoned and if you think otherwise thats exactly what you will end up being but as you say in your name sake alone.
Again thanks for the insight but that makes no sense whatsoever and in fact isn't even a proper sentence.
Stoned Rose said:mancity1 said:Stoned Rose said:FFS you lot!!! if you couldn't see that that was a team with extremely good attacking strength and midfield creativity you really and I mean really dont understand football.
Yes they've played 2 average sides so far but last year when we slapped Swansea and Bolton I'm sure most reasonable people could 'see' we had a bloody good team and would be there or thereabouts.
You lads seriously disagree that they'll be genuine contenders for the league??
If they are top or near top come February/March then yes I will agree with you.
That's good of you mate. You seriously need to wait until the season is nearly over to know if a team is a contender or not?
Reading and Wigan will be candidates for the drop this season.
Seems strange that you can confidenty spot relegation fodder after 2 games, but not a good team.
You probably think because a lady you fancy smiles at you twice in succession your a shoe in to rattle her cage later that night.
Ladies dont bother smiling at me mate they know I'm simply unattainable.
It rarely works out that way Stoned and if you think otherwise thats exactly what you will end up being but as you say in your name sake alone.
Again thanks for the insight but that makes no sense whatsoever and in fact isn't even a proper sentence.
School Teacher or Local Government Officer? Must be one or the other to be that condescending.
Tevez City
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 May 2010
- Messages
- 13,914
cookster said:Stoned Rose said:cookster said:Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha
Reading and Wigan and we have the best player in the prem!
I know it's fashionable to knock everything TC says but to be fair he has a point there. The lad looks fuckin mustard.
Also seems fashionable to rate Hazard as the best Premier League player based on 2 performances against cannon fodder.
Not at all
I rates Hazard higher than Silva & Nasri before he signs for Chelsea.
Stoned Rose
Well-Known Member
mancity1 said:Stoned Rose said:cookster said:Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha
Reading and Wigan and we have the best player in the prem!
I know it's fashionable to knock everything TC says but to be fair he has a point there. The lad looks fuckin mustard.
Its not fashionable SR its just that most people don't jump to conclusions.
He has pace , guile and knows how to draw a foul in the box and given the reports about him in France he is obviously a plus for Chelski and at 32m they would hope he is but lets not have a wank fest over the bloke after two games against mediocre opposition and on the basis of these performances think Chelski are the real deal again , its way too early for that.
bet you didn't join the Aguero wankfest post Swansea last season did you mate? you're far to suave and cool for that.<br /><br />-- Wed Aug 22, 2012 10:12 pm --<br /><br />
Tevez City said:cookster said:Stoned Rose said:I know it's fashionable to knock everything TC says but to be fair he has a point there. The lad looks fuckin mustard.
Also seems fashionable to rate Hazard as the best Premier League player based on 2 performances against cannon fodder.
Not at all
I rates Hazard higher than Silva & Nasri before he signs for Chelsea.
I recall TC saying this in the Hazard thread several times and he was ridiculed each time by the BM school bullies.
Stoned Rose said:mancity1 said:Stoned Rose said:I know it's fashionable to knock everything TC says but to be fair he has a point there. The lad looks fuckin mustard.
Its not fashionable SR its just that most people don't jump to conclusions.
He has pace , guile and knows how to draw a foul in the box and given the reports about him in France he is obviously a plus for Chelski and at 32m they would hope he is but lets not have a wank fest over the bloke after two games against mediocre opposition and on the basis of these performances think Chelski are the real deal again , its way too early for that.
bet you didn't join the Aguero wankfest post Swansea last season did you mate? you're far to suave and cool for that.
-- Wed Aug 22, 2012 10:12 pm --
Tevez City said:cookster said:Also seems fashionable to rate Hazard as the best Premier League player based on 2 performances against cannon fodder.
Not at all
I rates Hazard higher than Silva & Nasri before he signs for Chelsea.
I recall TC saying this in the Hazard thread several times and he was ridiculed each time by the BM school bullies.
You seem to try alot of verbal bullying yourself.
MSP said:though I didn't like him in bad Tevez times, TC knows more about football than most of you that jump to say crap about him as soon as he posts something.
I am happy you are going into bat for the man MSP.
Most of us haven't said crap about him though to correct you , we have said he is jumping to conclusions and we have some point of disparity to the conclusions he draws after 187 minutes of 2012/2013 premiership football for Chelski.
As for him knowing more about football than us mere mortals again I am happy for you that you think that MSP.
I wasn't aware we were in a contest of all things football knowledge wise but as you allude to we are can I ask you what knowing more about football than someone else actually constitutes?