You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Chelski v Royals
- Thread starter mancity1
- Start date
Tevez City said:It seems that the current bluemoon rules are:
It is only allowed to praise City players
Or players that Mancini or the club are interested in, and IF they ended up somewhere else they will become S**T and it is not allowed to praise them again.
You are not allowed to question the manager decisions at all until he leave the club.
The posters and some mods have the right to insult you, but if you defended yourself and spoke to them in the same trashy language they are using then you will be band.
The only rules are regarding the code of conduct TC and sometimes mods give some latitude to those that in fringe on them in the heat of the moment or the desire to leap before looking.
The rest of your spiel is a gross generalisation based upon the knowledge that some posters have raised some queries to the conclusions you have drawn about Hazard and Chelski's season based on their two performances this season.
You are playing the flawed victim here TC and I for one don't buy into the accuracy of your assertions or your logic in this instance.
I for one hope you stick to those conclusions should they come a cropper against Newcastle on Saturday and Hazard has a mare.
squirtyflower
Well-Known Member
out of interest, which mods?Tevez City said:It seems that the current bluemoon rules are:
It is only allowed to praise City players
Or players that Mancini or the club are interested in, and IF they ended up somewhere else they will become S**T and it is not allowed to praise them again.
You are not allowed to question the manager decisions at all until he leave the club.
The posters and some mods have the right to insult you, but if you defended yourself and spoke to them in the same trashy language they are using then you will be band.
MSP
Well-Known Member
mancity1 said:Tevez City said:It seems that the current bluemoon rules are:
It is only allowed to praise City players
Or players that Mancini or the club are interested in, and IF they ended up somewhere else they will become S**T and it is not allowed to praise them again.
You are not allowed to question the manager decisions at all until he leave the club.
The posters and some mods have the right to insult you, but if you defended yourself and spoke to them in the same trashy language they are using then you will be band.
The only rules are regarding the code of conduct TC and sometimes mods give some latitude to those that in fringe on them in the heat of the moment or the desire to leap before looking.
The rest of your spiel is a gross generalisation based upon the knowledge that some posters have raised some queries to the conclusions you have drawn about Hazard and Chelski's season based on their two performances this season.
You are playing the flawed victim here TC and I for one don't buy into the accuracy of your assertions or your logic in this instance.
I for one hope you stick to those conclusions should they come a cropper against Newcastle on Saturday and Hazard has a mare.
He is victim and is bullied here for months.. and he is dealing with it in amazingly good manner. I would get banned long time ago..
Tevez City
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 May 2010
- Messages
- 13,914
squirtyflower said:out of interest, which mods?Tevez City said:It seems that the current bluemoon rules are:
It is only allowed to praise City players
Or players that Mancini or the club are interested in, and IF they ended up somewhere else they will become S**T and it is not allowed to praise them again.
You are not allowed to question the manager decisions at all until he leave the club.
The posters and some mods have the right to insult you, but if you defended yourself and spoke to them in the same trashy language they are using then you will be band.
I need to do a search on my previous posts to find who exactly, and I will pm you once I found it.
Marvin said:I wouldn't start throwing your weight around after a comment like that.if you couldn't see that that was a team with extremely good attacking strength and midfield creativity you really and I mean really dont understand football
A dodgy pen, goalkeeping error and an offside goal. CFC really struggled and Reading should have had the game won in the 1st half.
In the end they did what they had to and you have to credit them for that but like you Marvin as was our performance against Southampton it was far from convincing.
Cech made a howler as well and overall it was a game between two sides that played it like a cat on a hot tin roof as they say.
The only real piece of class was that Reading Russian dynamo but in truth it was the owners better half (LOL).
Forgetting their last goal I can safely say if they fall behind against Newcastle on Saturday they will find it much harder to get three points from that game despite being at home.
Tevez City
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 May 2010
- Messages
- 13,914
Pam said:Tevez City said:It seems that the current bluemoon rules are:
It is only allowed to praise City players
Or players that Mancini or the club are interested in, and IF they ended up somewhere else they will become S**T and it is not allowed to praise them again.
You are not allowed to question the manager decisions at all until he leave the club.
The posters and some mods have the right to insult you, but if you defended yourself and spoke to them in the same trashy language they are using then you will be band.
Question the manager about which decisions?
I am over the moon because he signed a new contract
But it is normal that there is no one person on the planet that you will agree with every time
Sometimes I criticize his decisions whether its the wrong line up or the wrong sub or even the wrong signing. ( That doesn't mean I am right at all, it is just my opinion "right or wrong" during that time )
MSP said:mancity1 said:Tevez City said:It seems that the current bluemoon rules are:
It is only allowed to praise City players
Or players that Mancini or the club are interested in, and IF they ended up somewhere else they will become S**T and it is not allowed to praise them again.
You are not allowed to question the manager decisions at all until he leave the club.
The posters and some mods have the right to insult you, but if you defended yourself and spoke to them in the same trashy language they are using then you will be band.
The only rules are regarding the code of conduct TC and sometimes mods give some latitude to those that in fringe on them in the heat of the moment or the desire to leap before looking.
The rest of your spiel is a gross generalisation based upon the knowledge that some posters have raised some queries to the conclusions you have drawn about Hazard and Chelski's season based on their two performances this season.
You are playing the flawed victim here TC and I for one don't buy into the accuracy of your assertions or your logic in this instance.
I for one hope you stick to those conclusions should they come a cropper against Newcastle on Saturday and Hazard has a mare.
He is victim and is bullied here for months.. and he is dealing with it in amazingly good manner. I would get banned long time ago..
I don't want to see anybody bullied MSP I am dead against it and I don't know about TC's past as you note I only referred to his posts today and would never get personal with TC in terms of personally abusing him.
His comments on Chelsea and Hazard despite what he believes are premature and naive and without any substance but that doesn't mean he should be told to f...off or be told he has no place on this forum or think he has less right to air his views on this forum.
He has as much right as you and me , no more no less.
Have your view and state your opinion fine and others can disagree with the view but believe it or not and sometimes you are right it hards to tell the difference but if mankind cannot distinguish between the comment a person makes and the person himself after all this time on the planet then we might as well light the fire and pull the misses by the hair into the cave as a means of foreplay once again.
MSP
Well-Known Member
thumb up :)